Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
Browsing: Gaming
Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum gestures as she speaks during her daily press conference at the Palacio Nacional in Mexico City Thursday. (AFP) Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Thursday that unless the US government presents “clear evidence” linking Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha to drug cartels, the charges announced against him on Wednesday are politically motivated. “We are not going to protect anyone who has committed a crime,” Sheinbaum said at her regular morning press conference, referring to the US Justice Department’s indictment against Rocha and other Mexican current and former officials for conspiring with the Sinaloa Cartel. “However, if there isn’t clear evidence, it is obvious that the objective of these indictments by the Department of Justice is political,” Sheinbaum added, saying that Mexico would not permit interference by a foreign government in its sovereign affairs. The charges against Rocha mark a new front in the US fight against cartels. While the US has repeatedly gone after drug kingpins, US indictments against sitting senior Mexican politicians are rare. Rocha’s indictment poses a problem for Sheinbaum, particularly because they are both from the same ruling Morena Party. Rocha is also an ally of Sheinbaum’s predecessor and mentor, former president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Rocha has denied the charges and said they were an attack against Mexico’s governing political movement. “They lack any truth or foundation whatsoever,” he said in a post on X, vowing they would be proven false. According to the US indictment, Rocha was elected as governor of Sinaloa in 2021 with the help of a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel run by the sons of founder Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, known as “Los Chapitos.” The Chapitos allegedly kidnapped and intimidated Rocha’s political rivals, the Justice Department said, in exchange for Rocha’s promise to allow the group to operate with impunity and distribute drugs to the US. The others charged by the US Justice Department include current and former state-level officials as well as the mayor and an ex-police commander for Culiacan, the Sinaloa state capital. “These politicians and law enforcement officials have abused their authority in support of the cartel, exposed and subjected victims to threats and violence, and sold out their offices in exchange for massive bribes,” according to the indictment. Sheinbaum stressed that due process would have to be followed in Mexico. “There has to be overwhelming evidence for an arrest warrant to be issued,” she said, referring to carrying out the US extradition requests that accompanied the indictment. The Mexican president said she had spoken to Rocha on Wednesday, telling him: “If there is nothing, there is nothing to fear.” Related Story Source…
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to reporters after passage of a Department of Homeland Security funding bill, Thursday at the US Capitol…
The war against Iran has cost the United States $25bn since it was launched in late February, a senior Pentagon official said yesterday. “We’re spending about $25bn on Operation Epic Fury. Most of that is in munitions,” acting Pentagon comptroller Jules Hurst told lawmakers, using the official name for US operation. Related Story Source link
Pakistan remains committed to facilitating US–Iran talks as channels stay open, says Foreign Ministry
Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said the country’s “constructive” diplomatic engagement to support de-escalation between the United States and Iran has continued, with sustained efforts aimed at facilitating a ceasefire.Ongoing contacts maintained with both Washington and Tehran over the past two weeksIslamabad reiterates commitment to regional stability and international peaceEmphasis on dialogue and principled diplomacy to address complex geopolitical challengesHe added that, under the leadership of Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif, Deputy Prime Minister Muhammad Ishaq Dar, and Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir, communication channels with all relevant parties have remained open as part of Pakistan’s mediation approach. Source link
Twenty-four people, including two firefighters, suffering from breathlessness, were taken to the hospital after a chlorine gas leak in the Kondhwa area, western India.Local authorities stated that the leak originated from an abandoned tank containing chlorine at a defunct water purification plant.They added that those affected were taken to the hospital for treatment after inhaling the gas. Source link
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan Mohammad Ishaq Dar discussed in a phone call Thursday with British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper the latest regional developments.Both sides emphasized the importance of maintaining constructive engagement to support stability and peace in the region and beyond, Pakistani news agency reported. Source link
Seven people were rescued and 17 bodies recovered after a boat broke down off Libya’s eastern coast and was stranded at sea for eight days, the Libyan Red Crescent said.In a statement, the organization said the operation was carried out in coordination with naval units and the Coast Guard in the city of Tobruk.The statement added that necessary legal procedures are underway, including the transfer of the bodies in coordination with local authorities and criminal investigation departments. It also noted that humanitarian assistance and medical care are being provided to survivors in cooperation with international organizations.Libya remains a major transit hub for irregular migrants due to its proximity to Europe and its long Mediterranean coastline. Source link
A woman visits a makeshift memorial on the steps of the town hall in the town of Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, (Reuters/File Photo) Family members of victims of one of Canada’s deadliest mass shootings sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman in US court Wednesday, alleging the company identified the shooter as a credible threat eight months before the attack but did not warn police. The lawsuits, filed in federal court in San Francisco, accuse OpenAI leaders of not alerting police because it would have exposed the volume of violence-related conversations on ChatGPT and potentially jeopardised the company’s path to a nearly $1 trillion initial public offering. The February shooting in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia left nine people dead, many of them children. An OpenAI spokesperson called the shooting “a tragedy” and said the company has a zero-tolerance policy for using its tools to assist in committing violence. “As we shared with Canadian officials, we have already strengthened our safeguards, including improving how ChatGPT responds to signs of distress, connecting people with local support and mental health resources, strengthening how we assess and escalate potential threats of violence, and improving detection of repeat policy violators,” the spokesperson said in a statement. The cases are part of a growing wave of lawsuits accusing artificial intelligence companies of failing to prevent chatbot interactions that plaintiffs say contribute to self-harm, mental illness and violence. They appear to be the first in the US to allege that ChatGPT played a role in facilitating a mass shooting. Jay Edelson, who is representing the plaintiffs, said he plans to file another two dozen lawsuits in the coming weeks against the company on behalf of other people impacted by the shooting. Jesse Van Rootselaar, whose interactions with ChatGPT are at the center of the lawsuits, shot her mother and stepbrother at home before killing an educational assistant and five students aged 12 to 13 at her former school on February 10, according to police. Van Rootselaar, who was 18, then died by suicide. The plaintiffs include relatives of those killed at the school and a 12-year-old girl who survived after being shot three times but remains in intensive care. According to one of the complaints, OpenAI’s automated systems in June 2025 flagged ChatGPT conversations in which the shooter described gun violence scenarios. Safety team members recommended contacting the police after concluding she posed a credible and imminent threat of harm, said the complaint, which cites a Wall Street Journal article from February about the company’s internal discussions. But Altman and other OpenAI leadership overruled the safety team and police were never called, the lawsuit alleges. The shooter’s account was deactivated, but she was able to get a new account and continue using the platform to plan her attack, the lawsuit claims. Following the publication of the Wall Street Journal article, the company said the account was flagged by systems that identify “misuses of our models in furtherance of violent activities” but the issues did not meet its internal criteria for reporting to law enforcement. Last week, a local Tumbler Ridge newspaper published an open letter in which Altman said he was “deeply sorry” the account was not flagged to law enforcement. In a blog published Tuesday, OpenAI said it trains its models to refuse requests that could “meaningfully enable violence,” and notifies law enforcement when conversations suggest “an imminent and credible risk of harm to others,” with mental health experts helping assess borderline cases. The company said it continually refines its models and detection methods based on usage. The lawsuits seek an unspecified amount of damages and a court order requiring OpenAI to overhaul its safety practices, including mandatory law enforcement referral protocols. One of the victims originally filed her lawsuit in Canadian court but dismissed it to pursue her claims in California, Edelson said. The lawsuits over the Tumbler Ridge shooting come after multiple lawsuits against OpenAI have been filed in US state and federal court in recent months over claims ChatGPT facilitated harmful behavior, suicide, and, in at least one case, a murder-suicide. The lawsuits, which are still in early phases, will force courts to grapple with what role an AI platform can play in promoting violence and whether the company can be held liable for its actions or the actions of its users. OpenAI has denied the claims in the lawsuits, arguing in the murder-suicide case that the perpetrator had a long history of mental illness. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced earlier this month a criminal investigation into ChatGPT’s role in a 2025 shooting at Florida State University. Related Story…
The US Supreme Court appeared sympathetic Wednesday towards moves by President Donald Trump’s administration to strip humanitarian protections from hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants, part of his signature immigration crackdown. The justices heard arguments in the administration’s appeal of rulings by federal judges in New York and Washington, DC, halting its actions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, previously provided by the US government to more than 350,000 people from Haiti and 6,100 from Syria. The legal dispute presents a test of Trump’s executive power and the Supreme Court’s traditional deference to presidents on matters of immigration, national security and foreign policy. The court last year let the administration end TPS for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans. US Solicitor General D John Sauer, arguing for the Trump administration, said the lawsuits challenging the TPS revocation are meritless and barred by federal law. The lawsuits before the Supreme Court “challenge the very kind of foreign policy-laden judgments that are traditionally entrusted to the political branches,” Sauer said. Revoking TPS and other humanitarian protections is part of Trump’s broader rollback of legal and illegal immigration since he returned to office in January 2025. In defending its actions on TPS, the administration has said such protections were always meant to be temporary. The United States first provided these protections to Haitians after a major earthquake in 2010 and to Syrians after their country descended into civil war in 2012. Under US law, TPS is a designation that allows migrants from countries stricken by war, natural disaster or other catastrophes to live and work in the United States while it is unsafe for them to return to their home countries. Ahilan Arulanantham, the lawyer representing the Syrian immigrants, said the administration’s position “contravenes the text, bedrock administrative law and common sense,” adding that “the government reads the statute like a blank check.” The administration has said it followed proper procedures, and has made the broader argument that courts cannot second-guess its TPS decisions in the first place, an assertion that if accepted by the court could doom challenges going forward. The law governing TPS “bars judicial review of both the (Department of Homeland Security) secretary’s ultimate decision, whether to designate, extend or terminate and of each antecedent step along the way to that determination,” Sauer told the justices. “That provision means what it says,” Sauer said, adding that “attempts to carve out exceptions to the review bar would eviscerate it.” The Trump administration has drawn parallels between the revocation of TPS and Trump’s travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries during his first term, which the Supreme Court declined to block in a 2018 decision known as Trump v. Hawaii. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three liberal justices, said the administration’s position is at odds with the relevant federal statute and the US Constitution. “Congress could have said any termination of TPS status is unreviewable, but it didn’t,” Sotomayor said. The relevant statute may not allow a challenge to the “substantive conclusions” of whether TPS should be terminated, but it does seem to allow challenges to the procedural steps undertaken to get there, Sotomayor said. “What you are basically saying is Congress wrote a statute for no purpose,” Sotomayor said. Federal law, Sotomayor said, clearly “set forth procedural steps that had to be followed.” TPS recipients, until the termination, “are here lawfully with permission,” Sotomayor added. “They are entitled to due process, and now Congress has given them a process — it may not be a court process, but that’s okay, it’s a process — and you are saying it is unreviewable whether the president has followed that process.” The Supreme Court has granted the Republican president’s requests to immediately implement various hardline immigration policies while legal challenges continue to play out in courts. For instance, it let Trump deport immigrants to countries where they have no ties and let federal agents target people for deportation based in part on their race or language. The legal dispute could have wide implications, affecting 1.3 million immigrants from all 17 countries currently designated for TPS, according to the plaintiffs. Trump’s administration has sought to rescind the protections for 13 of those countries so far. Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Sauer why Congress would have wanted to prohibit judicial review of TPS determinations. Sauer responded that revoking a TPS determination is “the sort of foreign policy-freighted decision that lies at the heartland” of the executive branch’s competence. “Those sort of determinations being second-guessed at the district courts – it’s almost like these district court judges (are) appointing themselves junior varsity secretaries of state,” Sauer said. Lower courts ruled against the TPS terminations, finding that administration officials failed to follow mandatory protocols to assess conditions in a country before revoking its designation. The Trump administration has argued that courts should not be second-guessing whether government agencies engaged in sufficient consultant with each other before terminating TPS. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito seemed to endorse that argument, saying “it is always going to be possible to raise procedural objections to what’s been done.” When TPS for Syrians was terminated, “there was some consultation,” Alito said. “It was very brief, and maybe it was not what one would hope for, but still.” At issue are actions taken last year by Kristi Noem, Trump’s former Department of Homeland Security secretary, to revoke the TPS designations for Syria and Haiti, stating that providing this status to them was contrary to US national interests. Related Story Source link
Artefacts recovered from the US following a repatriation operation are displayed during a presentation at the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, in Rome,…

