Editor's Picks
Opinion
Travel & Tourism
Volker Türk highlighted growing threats to the media in a message ahead of World Press Freedom Day, observed annually on 3 May. “When attacks on the media are normalised, freedom itself begins to decay, and with it, the foundations of peace, security,…
Most Read
Share It!
Soccer
World News
Volker Türk highlighted growing threats to the media in a message ahead of World Press Freedom Day, observed annually on…
The Sudanese Journalists Syndicate is the latest recipient of the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize in recognition of…
Features
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
Health & Fitness
Trending Now
To understand the new politics stance and other pro nationals of recent times, we should look to Silicon Valley and…
Latest Articles
People arriving with empty LPG cylinders for refilling, in a village on the outskirts of Uttar Pradesh’s Jewar…
FILE PHOTO: A Spirit Airlines flight arrives at Fort Lauderdale – Hollywood International Airport, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida,…
Amid a large crowd that filled the stands of the dedicated drift circuit at Qatar Racing Club (QRC), and with the participation of an elite group of drift champions from Qatar, the GCC, and the wider region, the third round of the Qatar Drift Championship came to a close.The competitions, which extended over two days, were full of surprises, starting with the first and second qualifying sessions.Riyadh al-Mabsali managed to record the best score, topping the standings with 88.67 points, leaving second place to the overall championship leader Ahmed al-Amri, while Mohammed al-Jaber delivered a strong performance that placed him third.This position secured him the top spot in qualifying for the local category, which saw the participation of eight drivers in this round. Yasser Mustafa finished second in the local category qualifying, while Yazan Jabsha took third place.The action began with the first round, which featured eight races. Qualifying leader Riyadh al-Mabsali defeated Fahad al-Jadaie, who was making his first appearance in the championship after missing the previous two rounds.Last round’s runner-up Mohammed Khurshid overcame his rival Mohammed al-Azmi. Meanwhile, Mesyar Abu Shaiba advanced to the second round after defeating the two-time local category champion Abdullah al-Muhtasib.Yasser al-Shatir was absent from his scheduled matchup against Yazan Jabsha due to car issues, allowing Jabsha to advance automatically to the second round.On the other side of the bracket, second-place qualifier Ahmed al-Amri defeated Ahmed Jaber to move on to the next round.Last season’s champion Ali Makhseed also advanced after overcoming Mazen Nasser. In an all-local matchup between Mohammed al-Jaber and Khaled al-Shafie, victory went to al-Jaber.In the final first-round battle, Salem al-Sarraf defeated Bkhaiet al-Hajri to secure the last spot in the second round.Based on these results and what followed in the second round, Mohammed al-Jaber was crowned local category champion, achieving a perfect score after winning the qualifying sessions.Last season’s champion Yazan Jabsha finished second.In the second round, both Ali Riyadh al-Mabsali and Mesyar Abu Shaiba qualified for the first semifinal. On the other side, Ahmed al-Amri advanced to the second semi-final following an intense and highly competitive battle against Ali Makhseed.The first semifinal between Riyadh al-Mabsali and Mesyar Abu Shaiba ended in favour of Abu Shaiba. The second semi-final brought together Ahmed al-Amri and Mohammed al-Jaber.The victory ultimately went to al-Amri, who reached his second final of the season. Attention turned to the final, where opening-round winner al-Amri faced Abu Shaiba. Al-Amri claimed his second victory of the season, while Abu Shaiba finished second. The fourth round of the championship will take place in March 2026. Source link
When a US federal judge ruled in late November that Meta does not maintain an illegal monopoly in social media, it was a reminder that even the strongest evidence can look weak when enforcers act too late. Rejecting the US Federal Trade Commission’s narrow market definition, the court instead concluded that Meta, formerly known as Facebook, competes against a broad array of rivals such as TikTok and YouTube. While legal scholars can and will dissect the opinion, the biggest takeaway is that timing matters in dynamic markets, implying that antitrust authorities must develop a preventive approach, rather than relying solely on reactive measures. The case centred on Facebook’s acquisitions of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014, when both were unmistakably competitive threats. Facebook said so itselfBut the case collapsed under the weight of today’s market reality. Instead of considering the world as it existed when the mergers occurred, the court (incorrectly) cited the rise of TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube Shorts as evidence that Facebook lacked monopoly power. The flaws in the court’s reasoning reflect a deeper problem with litigating consummated mergers: it asks judges to travel back in time and forget what they now know. Questions like “Would Instagram have become this significant without Facebook’s investment?” or “What competition might have emerged if the acquisitions had not taken place?” are inherently counterfactual. It is very difficult to measure the impact of competition that never existed. This suggests that the acquisitions should have been challenged when they were first proposed – a difficult task, but not as hard as challenging consummated deals. Predicting the future is less formidable than reconstructing the present on the basis of an imaginary past. The flaws of late enforcement were also on display in the Google antitrust trial. Even as a US federal judge ruled in 2024 that Google had illegally monopolised general-search services, the remedy was softened by the perception that AI chatbots were already reshaping the market. Even the boldest proposed remedies centred less on restoring competition in search and more on ensuring that the next tech frontier remains open. Regulators should have prevented Facebook from acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp in the first place, but erred on the side of caution, fearing false positives and believing that the market would self-correct. But that decision has proved impossible to unwind, even though Facebook’s acquisition of direct competitors in a competitive market should have been a straightforward win for antitrust authorities – the very kind of textbook harm the law is designed to prevent. To their credit, the FTC and the department of justice under former US president Joe Biden had begun to develop and use their preventive toolkit. They challenged several mergers (including Nvidia-Arm, Illumina-GRAIL, and Microsoft-Activision Blizzard), examined practices in nascent industries such as AI partnerships, and launched early probes into emerging monopolies in the cloud computing and semiconductor markets. But the pendulum has swung back under Donald Trump’s second administration, which has pursued merger settlements, dialled back investigations into AI giants, and revived the myth that tech firms are the guardians of innovation and national security. It doesn’t have to be this way. US antitrust regulators now have stronger merger guidelines and a clearer understanding of how digital markets work. What they need is the political will to act early and decisively. The same applies to other governments. The most consequential tech mergers are reviewed simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions, and regulators in the European Union and the UK also have powerful preventive tools, including merger review and market studies. Even just initiating an investigation can create enough friction and uncertainty for parties to abandon a deal, as happened with Nvidia-Arm and Visa-Plaid. But the global scramble to attract AI investment has pushed competition enforcement into retreat. Amid increasing geopolitical turbulence, regulators are forgetting the hard-earned lessons of the platform era and pulling back precisely when they should be applying those lessons to block anti-competitive AI mergers and prevent the emergence of AI monopolies. The result is a classic collective-action problem, even though all it takes is one courageous competition authority to block a global deal and change the trajectory of an entire market. The Meta decision can seem like much ado about nothing: one case that was too difficult to win despite overwhelming evidence. But viewed in a broader context, it becomes clear that timing makes all the difference in antitrust enforcement. Regulators must learn to flex their preventive muscle to have any hope of taming Big Tech. – Project Syndicate Related Story Source link
It only took a matter of minutes after the heavy overnight rain first began to fall for Jamil al-Sharafi’s tent in southern Gaza to flood, drenching his food and leaving his blankets sopping wet.The winter rains have made an already precarious life worse for people like Sharafi, who is among the hundreds of thousands in the Palestinian territory displaced by the war, many of whom now survive on aid provided by humanitarian organisations. A displaced Palestinian woman collects wet clothes at a beach tent camp, after it was flooded by…
AC Milan’s French forward #18 Christopher Nkunku (C) celebrates after scoring his team second goal during the Italian…
