Browsing: Gaming
U.S. President Donald Trump departs the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 1, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque More than two months into a conflict that has failed to deliver a decisive military or diplomatic win, President Donald Trump faces the risk that a standoff with Iran will drag on indefinitely and leave an even bigger problem for the US and the world than before he launched the war. With both sides outwardly confident they hold the upper hand and their positions far apart, there is no obvious off-ramp in sight, even as Iran submitted a fresh proposal to restart negotiations. Trump quickly rejected it on Friday. For the US president and his Republican Party, the implications of a continued impasse are grim. An unresolved conflict would likely mean the global economic fallout, including high US gasoline prices, will persist, putting further pressure on Trump, whose poll numbers are falling, and darkening Republican candidates’ prospects ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections. UNMET GOALSThose costs highlight a deeper problem: the war has failed to achieve many of Trump’s stated goals. While there is little doubt that waves of US and Israeli strikes heavily degraded Iran’s military capabilities, many of Trump’s often-shifting war objectives — from regime change to shutting Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon — remain unfulfilled. Fears for a more protracted deadlock have grown since Trump called off a trip by his negotiators to Islamabad last weekend and then dismissed an Iranian offer to halt the war, suspended since April 8 under a ceasefire agreement. Tehran proposed setting aside discussion of its nuclear program until the conflict is formally ended and a deal is reached on reopening the Strait of Hormuz. That was a non-starter for Trump, who has demanded the nuclear issue be dealt with at the outset. There was a glimmer of hope on Friday when state news agency IRNA reported Tehran had sent a revised proposal through Pakistani mediators, causing a drop in global oil prices that had risen sharply since Iran effectively closed the strait. Trump told reporters he was “not satisfied” with the offer, though he said there were ongoing contacts by phone. A failure to wrest the vital oil-shipping waterway from Iranian control at the conclusion of the conflict would be a major blow to Trump’s legacy. “He’d be remembered as the US president who made the world less safe,” said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East expert at Johns Hopkins University in Washington. White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said Iran’s “desperation” is increasing due to military and economic pressure, and Trump “holds all the cards and has all the time he needs to make the best deal.” RESUMING HOSTILITIES?With his next steps uncertain and no clear endgame, Trump has in private meetings raised the prospect of a prolonged naval blockade of Iran, possibly for months more, aimed at further squeezing off its oil exports and forcing it to reach a denuclearisation agreement, a White House official said on condition of anonymity. At the same time, he has left the door open to resuming military action. The US Central Command has prepared options for a “short and powerful” series of strikes as well as for taking over part of the strait to reopenit to shipping, Axios reported on Thursday. European diplomats said their governments, whose relations with Trump have been strained by the war, expect the current situation with Iran to persist. “It’s hard to see how this will end soon,” said one, speaking on condition of anonymity. Iran has remained defiant. It has exerted powerful leverage against the US and its allies, triggering an unprecedented energy supply shock by choking off shipping in the strait, where tanker traffic flowed freely before the war, carrying a fifth of the world’s oil. Analysts say Iran will be emboldened knowing that it will have this weapon at its disposal even after the war. “Iran has realised that, even in a weakened state, it can shut off the Strait at will,” said Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “That knowledge leaves Iran stronger than it was before the war.” Trump, who took office promising to avoid entanglement in foreign interventions, has also failed to achieve his main stated aim in attacking Iran on February 28: to close off its path to a nuclear weapon. A stockpile of highly enriched uranium is believed to remain buried following US and Israeli airstrikes last June and could be recovered and further processed into bomb-grade material. Iran says it wants the US to recognise its right to enrich uranium for what it says are peaceful purposes. Another of Trump’s declared war goals — forcing Iran to stop support for proxy groups such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah, Yemen’s Houthis and Palestinian Hamas — also remains unmet. Renewed peace talks are unlikely to yield a quick resolution, given the large gaps. At the request of Trump’s aides, intelligence agencies are studying how Iran would respond if he declared a unilateral victory and pulled back, US officials have told Reuters. ‘FROZEN CONFLICT’ RISKWith negotiations deadlocked, some analysts have suggested the war could devolve into a frozen conflict that would defy a permanent solution. That could prevent Trump from significantly scaling down forces in the Middle East. The US is already paying new strategic costs. Those include fractures with traditional European allies, who were not consulted before Trump went to war.Trump also must deal with a more hardline Iranian leadership, dominated by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The president’s call at the start of the conflict for the Iranian people to overthrow their rulers has gone unheeded. At home, Trump is under pressure to end a war that has dragged his approval rating to the lowest level of his term and spiked gasoline prices above $4 a gallon ahead of the midterms, in which Republicans are at risk of losing control of Congress. A second White House spokeswoman, Taylor Rogers, said Trump was committed to maintaining his party’s congressional majority and that high gasoline prices were only “short-term disruptions” that would be overcome as the conflict subsides. The Iranians, however, are mindful of Trump’s domestic troubles and may be prepared to wait him out, but the questionremains how long they can stave off economic calamity.“Iran isn’t fractured or folding, it’s playing for time,” Sina Toossi, a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy think tank in Washington, wrote on X. Related Story Source link
Customers shop at the Audible Story House in New York, on April 30, 2026. The pop-up store labeled as a “bookless bookstore” is dedicated to audiobooks.…
FILE PHOTO: Combat aircrafts from a NATO country stand in front of a hangar during a fighter plane maneuver exercise at the American military’s Ramstein Air…
Long-pacifist Japan has shed its self-imposed ban on lethal weaponry exports, gunning for a prominent place in the global defence trade — a challenging feat that analysts say could take years to achieve. Under Japan’s once-strict stance adopted following its World War II surrender and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it has generally restricted arms exports in recent times to non-lethal categories like rescue, transport and surveillance. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s government scrapped these constraints last month, allowing firms to supply lethal weaponry to any of the 17 countries where Japan has defence cooperation agreements. Prohibitions on sales to nations at war remain but can be circumvented under special circumstances. Five Japanese firms, including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, are already in the top 100 global defence companies, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). But they have largely lived off domestic demand from Japan’s military, often in cooperation with US defence firms. Analysts say a focus on high-tech sectors could help the transition, but caution that it could take years for defence exports to become a big contributor to economic growth, hampered by capacity and workforce shortages. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Ian Ma said it was a “transition from a domestic, ministry-led procurement model to a normal practice which companies could drive business opportunities just like other global companies are doing.” He added that as newcomers on the global market, Japanese firms should focus on “higher-tech niches” like naval and propulsion systems, advanced missiles, sensors and electronics. No ‘immediate impact’With conflicts raging around the world, the international defence market is huge and fast growing, soaring by 41% between 2016 and 2025 to almost $3 trillion, according to SIPRI.While Japanese firms may only export to 17 countries, those include some of the world’s biggest defence spenders like the United States, Germany, India and Britain. Evolutions in technology and the way wars are fought — notably with drones — are also making the global arms market more diffuse, which could benefit Japan, according to analysts at the Stimson Center. Along with a steep decline in Russian arms exports, Washington’s “increasingly unpredictable, extractive, and at times confrontational approach” has also pushed importers to seek alternatives to the United States, the Stimson Center said in a research note. “Though the trend remains nascent, for Japan, the wandering eyes of traditional US defence partners could add to the demand for the sorts of sophisticated capabilities Tokyo is well-prepared to offer.” Even before the new changes, Japan has been no slouch. Last year Mitsubishi Heavy Industries won a landmark order for 11 warships from the Australian navy. Japan is also developing a new fighter jet with Britain and Italy, and countries in Southeast Asia are reportedly interested in acquiring used Japanese submarines and warships. But Mitsubishi Electric, which supplied a radar system to the Philippines and may soon make air-to-air missiles with US partners, told AFP that the new rules would not have a “significant immediate impact on our business”. Rival IHI said that the changes “will not lead to an immediate acceleration of our defence equipment business”, but “will have a significant impact on creating a market environment that accelerates international cooperation”. ‘Homework’Ma cautioned that Japan has “homework” to do, including on production capacity, skilled labour, second and third-tier suppliers, certification, testing, maintenance support and the ability to “deliver on time”. Beyond the economic stakes, deepening security ties is also a strategic necessity for Japan, said Heigo Sato, a professor at Takushoku University, in a region where China is flexing its muscles and home to nuclear-armed North Korea. “When it comes to defence industry cooperation, Japan is by no means a country with the world’s most advanced weaponry; therefore, we must actively work to build relationships with other nations,” Sato told AFP. The Japanese public is not at all comfortable with the new strategy, with 55 % of respondents in a recent Nikkei poll saying that they were opposed to the expansion of arms exports.Days after Takaichi announced the new rules, dozens of protestors rallied in Tokyo. In World War II, “Japan committed acts of aggression, and in turn suffered enormous damage from the atomic bombs,” demonstrator Yura Suzuike told AFP. Japan’s pacifist constitution that followed had been drafted “with the resolve that we must never again wage war or kill people”, she said. Related Story Source link
US President Donald Trump announced that he intends to review an Iranian proposal aimed at ending the war, while expressing doubts about the likelihood of accepting it.In a post on the Truth Social platform, Trump said he would soon examine the plan submitted by Iran, but voiced reservations about its viability, noting that Tehran had not yet paid a sufficient price for its actions.And at a press conference in West Palm Beach, he said he had reviewed the broad outlines of Iran’s response to the US proposal and expected to receive the final version later. Regarding military options, Trump did not rule out resuming operations against Iran, saying that such a move could happen, and suggesting that Tehran would need a long time to rebuild its capabilities if the confrontation continued.He also referred to what he described as a lack of clarity in Iran’s leadership structure, noting that the new supreme leader had not appeared since the outbreak of the war.On the domestic front, Trump called on the Democratic Party not to obstruct US actions toward Iran, describing current blockade measures as relatively moderate. This comes as Trump continues to reject Iranian offers to advance stalled negotiations, maintaining his position of imposing a tight blockade on Iranian ports. At the same time, Iran has responded by closing the Strait of Hormuz.The Iranian Fars News Agency reported Saturday that Tehran had submitted a 14-point response to the U.S. proposal to end the war, outlining its framework for ending the conflict and conveying it to the Pakistani side. According to sources cited by Fars, the response to Washington’s nine-point proposal included a clear roadmap for ending the war, along with an emphasis on Iran’s red lines. It added that the message was delivered through a mediator after passing through the usual decision-making processes within Iran’s relevant institutions and obtaining the necessary approvals.Meanwhile, the Tasnim News Agency reported, citing its sources, that Tehran responded to a US proposal that included a request for a two-month ceasefire, stressing that issues should be resolved within 30 days and that the focus should be on ending the war rather than extending the truce.Two days ago, Trump said he did not intend to seek approval from the United States Congress to continue any military action against Iran after the expiration of the 60 days allowed under the Constitution for military operations without legislative authorization. Source link
President of Algeria Abdelmadjid Tebboune expressed Algeria’s readiness to contribute to efforts to resolve the crisis in Mali, in a way that would help restore security and stability, while emphasizing non-interference in the country’s internal affairs.During a regular meeting with representatives of local media, Tebboune said that Algeria is closely following developments in Mali with concern, expressing regret over what he described as a trajectory toward greater instability.He stressed that Algeria has not and will not intervene in Mali’s internal affairs, affirming that relations between the two countries are based on brotherhood and that Algeria has been and will continue to support Mali without seeking any special interests.He added that military solutions do not represent a way out of the crisis, noting that Malians are capable of overcoming the challenges they face. He also indicated that Algeria is ready to provide support if Mali requests it, with the aim of de-escalation and helping to overcome the crisis.The Algerian president also revealed that there have been indirect contacts between the two countries in recent times, amid escalating security tensions in Mali, which has recently witnessed increasing attacks by armed groups, further exacerbating instability in the Sahel region. Source link
People walk near a display at a currency exchange bureau in Tehran, as the value of the Iranian rial drops. Reuters A senior Iranian military officer said Saturday that renewed fighting with the US was “likely”, hours after President Donald Trump said he was not satisfied with an Iranian negotiating proposal. Iran delivered the new draft to mediator Pakistan on Thursday evening, state media reported, without detailing its contents. The war, launched by the US and Israel in late February, has been on hold since April 8, with one failed round of peace talks having taken place in Pakistan. “At this moment I’m not satisfied with what they’re offering,” Trump told reporters, blaming the stalled talks on “tremendous discord” within Iran’s leadership. He added that the decision he faced was between whether to “just blast the hell out of them” or to “try and make a deal”, saying that he would rather not take the first option. Saturday Mohammad Jafar Asadi, a senior figure in the Iranian military’s central command, said “a renewed conflict between Iran and the United States is likely”, in quotes published by Iran’s Fars news agency. “Evidence has shown that the United States is not committed to any promises or agreements,” he added. Deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi told diplomats in Tehran that “the ball is in the United States’ court to choose the path of diplomacy or the continuation of a confrontational approach”. Iran, he said, was “prepared for both paths”. Iran’s judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei said on Friday that his country had “never shied away from negotiations”, but would not accept the “imposition” of peace terms. The White House has declined to provide details on the latest Iranian proposal, but news site Axios reported that US envoy Steve Witkoff had submitted amendments to a previous one putting Tehran’s nuclear programme back on the negotiating table. Iran’s mission to the UN pointed to the United States’ massive nuclear arsenal, accusing it Saturday of “hypocritical behaviour” towards Iran’s own atomic programme. It went on to insist there was no legal “restriction on the level of uranium enrichment, so long as it is conducted under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s supervision, as was the case with Iran”. News of the new Iranian proposal had briefly pushed oil prices down nearly 5%, though they remain about 50% above pre-war levels amid the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz.Iran has maintained a stranglehold on the strait since the war began, choking off major flows of oil, gas and fertiliser to the world economy, while the United States has imposed a counter-blockade on Iranian ports. Speaking at a rally on Friday, Trump said “we’re like pirates” as he described an earlier helicopter raid on an oil tanker under the blockade. The vice-speaker of Iran’s parliament, meanwhile, said Iran would not “relinquish our rights in the Strait of Hormuz, and the movement of vessels in the Strait of Hormuz will not be the same as before”. Ali Nikzad added that under legislation before parliament for managing the waterway, 30% of tolls collected would go towards military infrastructure, with the rest earmarked for “economic development”. “Managing the Strait of Hormuz is more important than acquiring nuclear weapons,” he said. Despite the ceasefire in the Gulf, fighting has continued in Lebanon, where Israel has carried out deadly strikes despite a separate truce with the Iran-backed group Hezbollah. Lebanese state media reported a fresh series of strikes in the south Saturday, while Hezbollah claimed new attacks targeting Israeli troops. In Iran, the war’s economic toll is deepening, with oil exports crimped and inflation surging past 50%. “Everyone is trying to endure it, but… they are falling apart,” 40-year-old Amir, a Tehran resident, told an AFP reporter based outside the country. “We still have not seen much of the economic effects because everyone had a bit of savings,” he said, adding: “They had some gold and dollars for a rainy day.” “When they run out, things will change.” Related Story Source link
Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Jarrah Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah held a telephone call on Saturday with Pakistani Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar to discuss current developments in the region and ongoing efforts to address them.During the call, the Pakistani Foreign Minister emphasized Pakistan’s continuous efforts to promote constructive dialogue and diplomacy in support of peace and stability both within the region and beyond. Source link
Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed the latest regional developments during a phone call on Friday evening.The two sides reviewed efforts aimed at de-escalation and addressing the regional and international repercussions of current tensions, in a manner that supports lasting security and stability. Related Story Source link
Cuba condemned the US sanctions imposed on it, stating that they are illegal and arbitrary.Cuba’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla said in a post on the X platform that the US government responds with unilateral, illegal, and arbitrary measures against Cuba, describing the new sanctions announced by Washington yesterday (Friday) as unlawful and arbitrary, amid heightened tensions between the two countries.The new sanctions announced by US President Donald Trump primarily target foreign banks that cooperate with the Cuban government and include restrictions related to migration.Sanctions were also imposed on individuals and entities operating in several sectors on the island, including energy and mining, as well as on anyone found guilty of committing serious human rights violations.It is worth noting that Cuba, with a population of about 9.6 million, is experiencing a deep economic crisis that has been exacerbated by tighter US sanctions during Trump’s first term (2017-2021), along with structural imbalances in its centrally planned economy, leading to a near paralysis of economic activity since late January. Source link