Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
Browsing: Gaming
Bombing attacks mark first day of Colombia’s new right-wing government; one officer dead
Two bombing attacks in different parts of Colombia on Saturday marked the first day in office for new President Abelardo de la Espriella, leaving at least one police officer dead and several wounded. The tough-talking hard-right leader campaigned on confronting “narcoterrorism without truce” and ending peace talks with armed groups following his inauguration Friday in the southwestern city of Cali. Colombia’s army said FARC guerilla dissidents used explosives to destroy a highway tollbooth near Cali in the early hours of Saturday, with two security guards suffering minor injuries. Rebels under the command of Ivan Morodisco — one of the most wanted guerilla commanders in the country — who operate in the area that surround the bombed tollbooth, which was under construction on the Pan-American highway in the Santander de Quilichao municipality. Morodisco leads dissidents who broke away from the historic 2016 peace agreement between the FARC and Colombia’s government. De la Espriella condemned the bombing on social media Saturday, saying “attacking the country’s infrastructure is attacking progress” in an X post. “To those responsible, I send a clear message: there will be no refuge, no leniency and no impunity,” he added. About 1,000 kilometers away, in the northern department of Cesar, an officer was killed in another bombing that took place early Saturday when an explosive-equipped drone struck a police station, officials there said. Authorities there have not yet identified suspects, but De la Espriella vowed whoever is responsible “will not go unpunished.” The confrontational style of the first-time political leader, who has not made any secret of his admiration for US President Donald Trump and El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, now faces tough opposition from the guerilla groups and drug traffickers operating in Colombia. De la Espriella has promised to open mega-prisons like Bukele and to intensify bombing raids against guerilla groups and drug traffickers operating in Colombia, with support from the United States and Israel. His inauguration comes during the worst wave of violence the country has experienced in the last decade. A decade after landmark peace accords, pockets of Colombia are still ruled by dissident armed groups that dominate global cocaine production. Roberto Sandoval, a firefighter who lives in the neighborhood next to the tollbooth, told AFP tensions were high following the bombing. “We are all on edge, very tense and nervous.” Elsewhere in the neighborhood, windows shattered and left glass strewn on the bed of Sonia Zapata, a 68-year-old housewife. She said she feels “very nervous, very afraid.” Source link
Abelardo De La Espriella delivers his first speech as the country’s new president at the Pichincha Military Canton in Cali on Friday. (Reuters) With a lucrative legal career and a variety of colourful business projects under his belt, Colombia’s incoming President Abelardo de la Espriella now has grand plans to crush armed insurgents, cozy up to the US and overhaul the system. The millionaire lawyer with a taste for spectacle took office on Friday after a campaign focused on anger and fears about security. Following a legal career that saw him represent drug-trafficking paramilitaries, fraudsters and football stars, he has promised to restore order with an iron hand. During the campaign, he leaned heavily into his self-proclaimed nickname “The Tiger,” sharing AI-generated images of himself as a fanged tiger and the only candidate willing to wage war on crime and insurgency. In his inauguration speech he pledged that “in the age of the Tiger,” the state “will be forceful and decisive against crime.” “They will know how hard it bites when it comes to defending the Colombian people,” he said from the military garrison in Cali, in front of hundreds of uniformed personnel, four tanks and two helicopters. He swore to “rebuild the Republic” and defend democracy “by reason or by force.” He didn’t always play the tough guy. He previously lived in Florence, Italy, where he dabbled in opera, travelled by private jet and promoted his rum, wine and fashion brand — “De la Espriella Style.” He brought that flair, tailored clothing and a taste for provocation into public life. The message resonated with almost half of voters. De la Espriella won the presidential runoff, albeit by less than a percentage point. De la Espriella promised a sharp break with the outgoing leftist government in a hardline program of “all-out war” on armed groups, the construction of “mega-prisons,” a military alliance with Washington and Israel and a drastically reduced state. “People who have created wealth during their lives should run the country,” he once told AFP unapologetically. His rhetoric has often been incendiary. He once called for the Colombian left to be “gutted,” a comment he later withdrew. His campaign was also briefly tripped up by court rulings banning his use of national symbols like Colombia’s football jersey — decisions that were later overturned. Despite railing against what he describes as the failed political establishment, De la Espriella’s incoming cabinet features a familiar cast of right-wing politicians. “The horrible night is over,” he stated days before his inauguration, in reference to four years of leftist rule. He has leaned into a more conservative cultural message. Once openly atheist, De la Espriella now says he lives by “Judeo-Christian principles” and calls for a “cultural counterrevolution” to return the country to God. Supporters see a decisive leader prepared to confront Colombia’s entrenched violence. Critics warn that his confrontational style — and admiration for figures such as US President Donald Trump, Argentina’s Javier Milei and El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele — could deepen divisions in a country where past polarisation has brought bloodshed. Even his personal stories have stirred controversy. In one interview, he recalled tying fireworks to cats as a child, later insisting he was joking. His hot temper, penchant for swearing and making sweeping statements have done nothing to dent his popularity. For his base, those rough edges are part of the appeal. From a childhood he describes as carefree, “in the style of Tom Sawyer,” to a jet-set legal career and now the presidency, De la Espriella has built a narrative of success and self-reliance — one he argues Colombia should follow. Now, the “Tiger” faces the challenge of governing a country as divided as the campaign that brought him to power. Related Story…
A defence pact signed between Turkiye, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is technically the same as the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato)’s Article 5 mutual defence agreement, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said yesterday, adding the accord was not targeting Iran. He also said Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wanted to see the alliance expand, and that Egypt was a potential candidate to join, among others.The regional powers signed the “Makkah Joint Defence Agreement” on Friday, forging US allies alarmed at a regional conflagration that has brought Iranian missile fire onto Gulf oil exporters. In a joint statement, they said the accord intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression and stipulates that an armed attack against any of the three would be regarded as an attack on all.Speaking to the state-run Anadolu news agency, Fidan said the new alliance was not directed against Iran or any other country, but rather served as a general pledge to support the three allies’ security. He added that the allies would decide through consultations what degree, form, and format of support they would ask for in the event of an attack, but that no country would be considered a threat as long as a memberstate is not attacked. Turkiye, which has Nato’s second-largest army, has said the pact was open to expansion to other regional countries and did not seek to replace any existing alliances. “Nato is a giant military alliance where there are 32 countries. We have started here as three countries and we have to take very humble but concrete steps,” he said, adding efforts to finalise the pact had been underway for two years and eight months. He added that a committee of ministers similar to that within Nato would be formed as part of the alliance, as well as a general secretariat based in Saudi Arabia, but that operational details would be set at the first committee meeting. “Our president’s vision is that we don’t remain limited to three countries, that we grow and bring together all (regional) countries under this roof,” he said, adding Egypt could potentially join the pact once certain technical matters are resolved. In recent months, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Egypt formed a group to address regional issues, namely the war on Iran. Turkiye has said that the group – dubbed the R4 – aims to solidify its partnership through concrete mechanisms.Fidan also said Turkiye should be involved in an international coalition to protect shipping in the Red Sea from Houthi attacks because shipping safety concerned Ankara’s interests. Source link
US House Democrats preparing for a return to power are developing a broad investigative strategy targeting companies and financial firms surrounding President Donald Trump, instead of trying to impeach him immediately, sources reveal.Senior Democrats in the US House of Representatives and committee aides have discussed using hearings, subpoenas and document requests to obtain records from entities tied to Trump’s political and business orbit. It is a bet that investigating private companies and outside financial players will prove more fruitful than directly confronting a White House they expect to resist oversight, sources said. The approach reflects both Democratic caution and a lesson many in the party say they learned during Trump’s first term: that impeachment proceedings can consume Congress while allowing Trump to cast himself as the victim of a partisan campaign. Instead, Democrats involved in the planning envision using House investigative powers after November’s midterm elections to scrutinise the administration’s decision-making and examine whether Trump used his power to benefit himself, allies or donors. “We’re not going into this to impeach,” said a senior Democratic aide, describing the thinking among party leaders and committee staff. “No one wants a failed vote on day one. The focus is on building a body of evidence through investigations that can hold Trump accountable.” Republicans with a narrow House majority have grim chances of gaining the majority in November. Winning control would give Democrats the power to issue subpoenas, compel testimony and documents, hold public hearings and pursue contempt proceedings. Democrats expect the White House to fight or ignore requests aimed at the executive branch, making companies, contractors and financial firms working with the administration an important route for obtaining information, the sources said. The White House said in a statement that Trump has worked to thwart the “radical left’s agenda” and remains committed to preserving Republican majorities in Congress. A White House official said the administration is “prepared to respond to oversight requests, no matter who is in the House or Senate.” Three sources said Apple, Alphabet, Palantir, Blackstone, BlackRock and companies owned by Elon Musk, such as Tesla, have surfaced in discussions because of their contracts, regulatory exposure or administration dealings.The sources said no final target list has been established and no formal investigations have begun. The sources provided no further details about the investigations. Democrats are expected to examine Department of Homeland Security contracts, financing for Trump’s planned White House ballroom, corporate donors and alleged pay-to-play arrangements, two sources said.They also plan a probe of Trump-linked financial vehicles including 1789 Capital — a venture capital firm where his son Donald Trump Jr is a partner — and foreign sovereign wealth funds whose investments in Trump family-linked entities could raise questions about administration influence, the sources said.Because foreign funds may be harder for congressional committees to reach, Democrats are discussing seeking records from US-based firms and funds tied to Trump’s family and other intermediaries, the two sources said.Democrats have already begun laying the groundwork for investigations, two of the sources said.Party leaders are sending letters to companies, contractors and other organisations connected to potential investigations, they said. The requests seek records and pave the way for subpoenas if Democrats win the House, the two sources said.Representatives Robert Garcia from California and Jamie Raskin from Maryland, the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, respectively, said existing investigations would expand if Democrats win the House. “From sketchy Pentagon contracts lining the pockets of the president’s sons, Trump’s crypto billions, and the shady backroom deals for Trump donors, we will ensure we combat corruption when Democrats take back the House in November,” Garcia said in a statement. The letters include requests for information from media company Paramount Skydance over its dealings with the Trump administration and the proposed Warner Bros. Discovery deal as well as video platform YouTube and parent company Alphabet over the company’s $24.5mn settlement with Trump in September. Letters have also been sent to private prison operator GEO Group and security firm Salus Worldwide Solutions for their contracts with the DHS as well as commodity traders Vitol and Trafigura over the administration’s sale of Venezuelan oil, the two sources said. But the letters put potential targets on notice and signal records Democrats could subpoena. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in June on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Democrats haven’t ruled out impeaching Trump if they win back the House but that the party’s focus would be on pocketbook issues.Democrats involved in the planning say impeachment remains an option if investigations uncover evidence of an impeachable offence, but not as a first move.The calculation reflects the party’s experience during Trump’s first term, when he became the first US president to be impeached twice by the House before being acquitted by the Senate each time.“If investigations uncover evidence that we believe meets the threshold, we will not hesitate to move forward,” said the senior Democratic aide. Source link
WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 07: Chairman of the American Ocean Minerals Tom Albanese (R) listens as Senior Director of Global Supply Chain David Copley speaks during…
Historic Formula One cars are displayed during the Grand Prix Centenary event at Brooklands Museum and race circuit, in Weybridge, southwest of London yesterday. 2026 marks…
Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke (centre) takes part in a protest over alleged irregularities in the country’s major examinations, in New Delhi. (AFP/File photo) Two weeks after youth-led protests forced India’s education minister to resign, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is grappling with the fallout from one of its toughest political challenges in years.Led by the online Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), the demonstrations spread from New Delhi to other cities, broadening from anger over exam irregularities into a wider movement over unemployment, opportunities for young people and what critics describe as Modi’s increasingly authoritarian rule. While demonstrations are largely over after achieving key demands, AFP looks at what the protests revealed — and what could come next.The resignation of the education minister on July 25 marked a rare climbdown for a prime minister who has spent more than a decade cultivating an image of unwavering resolve. The authorities have since attempted to woo the youth, and parliament has hiked penalties for leaking exam papers.Police have withdrawn cases against protestors in several cities after criticism over the excessive use of force. The protests also exposed a rapidly changing digital landscape, with protesters using social media to spread their message.Modi, a keen user of X, has turned to Instagram — issuing his first vertical videos to tap into the youth medium of choice. The protests exposed how authorities are using AI-powered camera technology to monitor and identify demonstrators.Many women say they have been receiving rape threats and abusive messages online after their videos during the demonstrations went viral. Internet shutdown around the main protest site in New Delhi disrupted communication, forcing youngsters to find new ways to stay in touch.India ranked second worldwide in internet shutdowns last year, according to Access Now monitor, including localised blackouts during protests, conflict and communal violence. Exam leaks were the spark, but the anger quickly spread to deeper frustrations among young Indians over jobs, economic opportunities and a lack of faith in institutions.For many protesters, the prospect of uncertain employment after years of study and highly competitive examinations has become a symbol of a wider struggle for economic security. That gives the movement a potential staying power beyond the original dispute.Even if the government addresses exam cheating, it cannot easily resolve the broader grievances that brought young people onto the streets.The protests have left behind a youth movement with millions of followers online, but that does not guarantee lasting political influence.The CJP has said it will organise a “nationwide listening tour” to hear the concerns of young Indians, while continuing to back protests over exam irregularities. Demonstrations are still taking place in the eastern state of Jharkhand, suggesting the anger that fuelled the protests that began in the capital has not disappeared.CJP founder, Abhijeet Dipke, has called for “a public movement to restore trust and neutrality in public institutions”. “The public has become very frustrated and tired of these things. That is why our movement got such massive support,” he said.But “for now, the CJP will function as a pressure group”, Dipke added, rather than a political party.The protests could force India’s political parties to focus on the needs and demands of young voters.Young Indians make up a huge potential electoral constituency, but turning protest energy into votes is another matter.With nearly three years to go before the next national polls, both Modi’s ruling party and the opposition may try and harness the anger and frustration expressed by young people for electoral gain. …
Turkey's foreign minister said Saturday he expected Egypt to join a joint defence agreement with regional partners designed to stabilise the region that is grappling with the Middle East war.Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan signed the agreement on Friday against the backdrop of war between the United States and Iran, which has drawn in surrounding nations and disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea. The war has emboldened Iran and its Houthi allies in Yemen, both of which have attacked Saudi Arabia, and a drone last month hit US assets at an Egyptian port on the Mediterranean.Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan told state news agency Anadolu he expected Egypt to join the ‘Mecca Joint Defence Agreement’, calling the country a ‘natural partner on all issues’. ‘I believe that at the next stage Egypt will also be among us in the alliance. We already act toward one another as if we were alliance members,’ he said in an interview.’There are a few technical issues. Once these are implemented, there is no reason for Egypt not to be part of it.’ Fidan said the agreement does not target a specific country. ‘There is no common threat that we have put in writing,’ he said, according to the news agency. Pakistan's foreign ministry said Friday the pact meant an attack on any member would be regarded as an attack on all, adding it was ‘intended to strengthen collective deterrence’. In the interview, Fidan said the agreement was ‘the most important step toward bringing lasting stability to this region’, and suggested the alliance could expand further.’Under our president's vision, we should not remain limited to three countries. We should grow and, if necessary, bring all countries under this umbrella,’ he said Source link
Four people were killed in a helicopter crash on Saturday in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, including three Colombian tourists from the same family.Brazilian authorities reported that the helicopter went down in Tijuca National Park, a mountainside forest with very dense vegetation.Firefighters confirmed finding the charred bodies of the pilot and three women on a difficult-to-access mountain slope.Rio de Janeiro Mayor Eduardo Cavaliere said on X platform that he has asked Brazil’s National Civil Aviation Agency to immediately step up monitoring to ensure the safety of helicopter flights.In June, two helicopters collided over Rio and left six people dead.Helicopter rides are a popular attraction for tourists who want to see the city’s famed sights and the natural splendor of the seaside metropolis. Source link
A defence pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan establishes a new security alliance seeking to deter a bellicose Iran, offset an unreliable US and send a message to Israel, analysts say.As the Middle East war drags on, this alliance binds three Sunni powers — all allies of the United States — with a Nato-style clause that considers any attack on one country as an attack on all.Analysts doubt this provision will be enforced immediately, however, as the trio seeks a resolution to the war, with Pakistan and Turkiye acting as intermediaries.So what does the agreement mean in practical terms?Nearly six months into the Middle East war, the US has failed to deliver a knockout blow to Iran, and Tehran continues to choke off traffic in the Strait of Hormuz while its Houthi allies disrupt shipping in the Red Sea.This reality has upended the region’s security architecture — forcing a rethink of decades of conventional wisdom rooted in US military supremacy.Despite the archipelago of US bases across the region, American forces have struggled to intercept all of the drones and ballistic missiles fired by Iran and its proxies.The new alliance shows “American deterrence has been significantly weakened and that the Iranian threat will increasingly need to be managed by regional powers”, wrote Ali Shihabi, a political analyst close to the Saudi government.Since the onset of the war, Saudi Arabia has grown closer to Turkiye, with whom it previously had fraught ties, as well as Egypt and Pakistan. The four nations have supported mediation in the conflict.”The three countries are unusually complementary,” said Andreas Krieg, a lecturer in security at King’s College London.Oil-rich Saudi Arabia has wealth “but limited indigenous military-industrial depth”, he told AFP.Turkiye and Pakistan, meanwhile, face finance constrictions, but have powerful militaries.”Turkiye has technology and manufacturing capacity but needs markets and investment. Pakistan has manpower, military institutional depth and nuclear deterrence, but needs financing and industrial opportunities,” he said.The trio cannot replace the United States, but they are bridging a gap because Washington will not “restrain Israel or insulate Gulf infrastructure from Iranian retaliation”.It is in Saudi Arabia’s interest to seek “several layers of security rather than one American umbrella”, Krieg said, with the kingdom at the centre of this new alliance.With these resources combined, the alliance packs a powerful punch, in theory at least.The trio are unlikely to attack Iran should it repeat its strikes on Saudi Arabia.Pakistan, for one, has not hit its neighbour despite signing a similar defence pact with the kingdom last year.”Turkiye and Pakistan will not fight Iran. These countries view themselves as ‘stabilisers’ and want to create a political momentum to push for that,” wrote Asli Aydintasbas, a fellow at the Brookings Institution.Hesham Alghannam, a Saudi security analyst and researcher, agreed that neither country was likely to engage offensively in the short term, but drew a distinction between what the agreement “can deliver now versus what it aspires to become”.”If proxy attacks on Saudi territory continue and escalate, I would expect Pakistan to deepen its air defence and advisory role inside the kingdom, and Turkiye to accelerate defence-industrial transfers,” he said.He added that the “pact changes the calculus for anyone considering continued strikes on Saudi infrastructure”.Saudi Arabia has grown closer to Pakistan and Turkiye as deep divisions plague the Gulf, even as it reels from repeated attacks by Iran and its allies.Saudi Arabia and the UAE were embroiled in a public rift before the war, and though they recently appeared to reconcile, the UAE is likely to be wary of the new pact, analysts say.The US has long sought to build on the Abraham Accords that saw the UAE, Bahrain and others normalise relations with Israel, pushing for a regional alliance that integrates its close ally.But the new defence pact consolidates major US allies into an alternative security architecture that rejects Israel’s hegemony, analysts said.Pakistan and Turkiye have been vocal against Israel, while Saudi Arabia has insisted it will not normalise unless Israel agrees to a path to Palestinian statehood.”Washington would have wanted a security architecture that includes Israel and they’re still keen for Saudi Arabia to normalise ties,” said HA Hellyer of the Royal United Services Institute.”This alliance doesn’t point to that in the slightest.” Related Story Source link
