Author: Publisher
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth will make his first testimony before Congress on the Mideast war Wednesday, as efforts to end the conflict stalled with the United States reportedly skeptical of Tehran’s latest offer to unblock the Strait of Hormuz.Iran has blockaded the waterway — a vital conduit for oil and gas shipments — since the start of the US-Israeli offensive two months ago, sending shockwaves through the global economy.US officials did not dispute accounts by CNN and The Wall Street Journal that US President Donald Trump was skeptical of the proposal. During a White House state dinner Tuesday, Trump told Britain’s King Charles III and other guests that Iran has been “militarily defeated.”He added that “Charles agrees with me even more than I do — we’re never going to let that opponent have a nuclear weapon.”But an Iranian army spokesman told state TV on Tuesday that “we do not consider the war to be over,” saying Tehran had “no trust in America.””We have many cards that we have not yet used… new tools and methods of fighting based on the experiences of the past two wars, which will definitely allow us to respond to the enemy more decisively” should the fighting resume, Amir Akraminia said in an interview.Efforts to end the war have stalled in recent days, with Vice President JD Vance last week preparing to fly to Pakistan for new talks but then staying home.The latest Iranian proposal, passed along by Pakistan and studied by Trump administration officials in a meeting Monday, laid out red lines including on nuclear issues and Hormuz, according to Iran’s Fars news agency. The plan would reportedly see Tehran ease its chokehold on the strait and Washington lift its retaliatory blockade on Iranian ports while broader negotiations continue, including over the thorny question of Iran’s nuclear program. Source link
A woman walks past a giant billboard reading “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” at the Revolution Square in Tehran. (AFP) Iran warned last week that submarine cables in the Strait of Hormuz were a vulnerable point for the region’s digital economy, raising concerns about potential attacks on critical infrastructure. The narrow waterway, already a chokepoint for global oil shipments, is equally vital for the digital world. Several fibre-optic cables snake across the seabed of the strait, connecting countries from India and Southeast Asia to Europe via the Gulf states and Egypt. Subsea cables are fibre-optic or electrical cables laid on the sea floor to transmit data and power. They carry around 99% of the world’s internet traffic, according to the ITU, the United Nations specialised agency for digital technologies. They also carry telecommunications and electricity between countries, and are essential for cloud services and online communications. “Damaged cables mean the internet slowing down or outages, e-commerce disruptions, delayed financial transactions … and economic fallout from all of these disruptions,” said geopolitical and energy analyst Masha Kotkin. Gulf countries, particularly the UAE and Saudi Arabia, have been investing billions of dollars in artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure to diversify their economies away from oil. Both nations have established national AI companies serving customers across the region — all reliant on undersea cables to move data at lightning speed. Major cables through the Strait of Hormuz include the Asia-Africa-Europe 1 (AAE-1), connecting Southeast Asia to Europe via Egypt, with landing points in the UAE, Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia; the FALCON network, connecting India and Sri Lanka to Gulf countries, Sudan, and Egypt; and the Gulf Bridge International Cable System, linking all Gulf countries including Iran. Additional networks are under construction, including a system led by Qatar’s Ooredoo. While the total length of submarine cables has grown considerably between 2014 and 2025, faults have remained stable at around 150-200 incidents per year, according to the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC). State-sponsored sabotage remains a risk, but 70-80% of faults are caused by accidental human activities — primarily fishing and ship anchors, according to the ICPC and experts. Other risks include undersea currents, earthquakes, subsea volcanoes, and typhoons, said Alan Mauldin, research director at telecom research firm TeleGeography. The industry addresses these by burying cables, armouring them, and selecting safe routes, he said. The Iran war, nearing the two-month mark, has brought unprecedented disruption to global energy supply and regional infrastructure, including hits to Amazon Web Services data centers in Bahrain and the UAE. Subsea cables have been spared so far. However, an indirect risk exists from damaged vessels inadvertently hitting cables by dragging anchors.“In a situation of active military operations, the risk of unintentional damage increases, and the longer this conflict lasts, the higher the likelihood of unintentional damage,” Kotkin said. A similar incident occurred in 2024,when a commercial vessel attacked by Iran-aligned Houthis drifted in the Red Sea and severed cables with its anchor. The degree to which damage to the cables might impact connectivity in Gulf countries depends largely on how much individual network operators rely on them and what alternatives they have, according to TeleGeography. Repairing damaged cables in conflict zones poses a separate challenge to securing them. While the physical repair itself is not overly complicated, decisions by repair vessel owners and insurers may also be impacted by the risk of damage from fighting or the presence of mines, experts say. Permits to access territorial waters add another layer of difficulty. “Often one of the biggest problems with doing repairs is you have to get permits into the waters where the damage is. That can take a long time sometimes and can be the biggest source (of problems),” Mauldin said. Once the conflict ends, industry players will also face the challenge of re-surveying the sea floor to determine safe cable positions and avoid ships or objects that may have sunk during hostilities, he said. While potential damage to subsea cables would not cause a complete connectivity loss — due to land-based links – experts agree that satellite systems are not a feasible replacement, as they cannot handle the same volume of traffic and are more expensive. “It’s not as though you could just switch to satellite. That’s not an alternative,” Mauldin said, noting that satellites rely on connections to land-based networks and are better suited for things in motion, like airplanes and ships. Source link
Qatar’s beach volleyball stars Cherif Younousse and Ahmed Tijan stormed into the final of the Asian Beach Games — Sanya 2026 with a dominant straight-sets victory yesterday.The Qatari pair overpowered Thailand 2-0 (21-12, 21-14) in the semi-finals to set up a title clash against Iran, who advanced after defeating Oman in the other last-four encounter. Reflecting on the win, Tijan highlighted the team’s discipline and cohesion: “We approached the match against Thailand with strong focus from the very beginning and managed to impose our style of play. Our harmony on court made the difference. In matches like these, it’s crucial to minimize errors and make the most of every opportunity.” In handball, Qatar also booked a place in the final after a hard-fought 2-0 (13-8, 20-18) victory over Bahrain. The hosts controlled the first half, taking a solid 13-8 lead, but faced a tougher challenge in the second as Bahrain fought back to level the score at 18-18 in the closing moments. Abdulrazzaq Murad delivered the decisive blow, scoring the winning goal less than 30 seconds before the final whistle. Qatar will now meet Iran, who defeated Thailand, in the final. Meanwhile, Qatar’s men’s 3×3 basketball team comprised of Mohammed Bashir, Dejan Janic, Abdulrahman Saad, and Othman Deng advanced to the semi-finals with a 20-16 win over Iran. The team dictated the pace throughout, using aggressive offense and constant pressure to build and maintain their lead. They will face China in the semi-finals, while the Philippines take on Thailand in the other matchup. Source link
Britain yesterday sought to uphold a ban on pro-Palestinian group Palestine Action, which it has designated a terrorist organisation, after a court ruling that the move unlawfully interfered with freedom of expression. Palestine Action, which had increasingly targeted Israel-linked defence companies in Britain with a particular focus on Israel’s largest defence firm Elbit Systems, was proscribed under terrorism laws last year. London’s High Court ruled in February that the ban was unlawful, although it remains in force pending the outcome of the government’s appeal, which began yesterday. Lawyers for Britain’s interior minister, Shabana Mahmood, told the Court of Appeal that the finding that the ban had a significant impact on freedom of expression was “overstated and wrong”.Huda Ammori, who co-founded Palestine Action in 2020 and brought the successful challenge, argues proscription has imposed “severe restrictions on the fundamental free speech and assembly rights of vast numbers of people”. Palestine Action was banned shortly after a June break-in at the Royal Air Force’s Brize Norton air base, in which activists damaged two military planes.More than 2,700 people have since been arrested for holding signs in support of Palestine Action, though charges could be dropped if the High Court’s ruling is upheld. After February’s decision, London’s Metropolitan Police said it would pause arrests while reviewing its position, but resumed enforcement earlier this month, arresting over 500 people.The High Court’s decision was announced shortly after six people charged over the 2024 raid on Elbit were all acquitted of aggravated burglary. Source link
A Sudanese woman chooses a container filled with free food as part of the ‘Community Kitchen’ initiative, in Omdurman on April 21, 2026. KHALED DESOUKI /…
Militants and Tuareg separatists were advancing in northern Mali yesterday, three days after launching unprecedented attacks against the ruling junta, in what the government’s Russian allies said remained a “difficult” situation. The attacks were the largest in nearly 15 years and saw two former foes — insurgents and Tuareg separatists — join forces against the military junta and its Russian paramilitary backers, analysts say. Defence Minister Sadio Camara — seen as the mastermind behind the junta’s pivot to Russia — was killed in two days of fierce fighting between the army and Tuareg rebels of the Azawad Liberation Front (FLA) allied with the Al-Qaeda-linked Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM). Russia’s defence ministry said yesterday that the rebels, who have captured a key town in the mostly desert north, were “regrouping” and the situation “remains difficult”.The fighting saw “attempts made to seize key facilities in the capital, Bamako — first and foremost, the presidential palace”, the ministry said. It confirmed that mercenaries from Russia’s Africa Corps, controlled by the government in Moscow and sent to back up the Malian junta, had been forced to withdraw from the northern town of Kidal, now under the armed groups’ control. The Kremlin, separately, said it urgently wanted peace and stability in Mali, which has battled more than a decade of violence and other conflict.Abandoned and withdrawn The large-scale attacks at the weekend raise questions about the junta’s ability to tackle the armed groups, despite its insistence that its strategy, foreign partnerships and increased military efforts have stemmed the threat. The notable absence of Goita, who seized power in 2020 pledging to combat the militants, has prompted uncertainty about the future of the country’s military leaders.A Malian security source told AFP that Goita was not taking any risks for “security reasons”. “The military leadership is currently drawing lessons from the prevailing situation,” an elected official in Bamako said on condition of anonymity.In a sign of the high tensions in the west African nation, the army has abandoned several positions in the northern Gao region, local sources told AFP yesterday. Gao is the army’s second-largest military stronghold after Kati, a garrison town near Bamako which is home to several senior junta officials and was targeted in the weekend attacks.“The military have abandoned their position in Labbezanga, near the Niger border. They have withdrawn to Ansogo,” a local politician told AFP on condition of anonymity. As well as Kati, the simultaneous weekend attacks targeted the towns of Kidal and Gao in the north, and Sevare in the centre.Two loud blasts were heard late on Monday near the airport on the outskirts of Bamako, an AFP journalist said.The cause of the blasts could not immediately be identified. “It wasn’t an exchange of gunfire and the explosions were coming from the area of Base 101 at the airport,” a resident told AFP.Diversion? The attacks near the centres of Malian power have been seen by some analysts as a diversion to seize Kidal.Kidal, a pro-independence stronghold, was controlled by Tuareg rebel groups for years before being retaken in November 2023 in an army offensive, supported by Russian mercenaries from Africa Corps’ predecessor, the Wagner Group. Central Mali, where Mopti is located, was also targeted and the security situation remained unclear yesterday.The attacks are reminiscent of a crisis that rocked Mali in 2012, when Tuareg rebels joined forces with jihadists to capture strategic hubs in the vast, remote north. That offensive was repelled by forces from former colonial ruler France, who have since left the Sahel country.The alliance between the militants and Tuareg rebels eventually unravelled when they turned on each other and the jihadists drove the Tuareg separatists out.The latest attacks are the result of a new alliance forged a year ago.Although the two groups have different goals, according to experts, they are united against a common enemy — the military junta that has ruled since 2020 and its Russian paramilitary backers.A Source link
The United Arab Emirates will withdraw from the Opec and Opec+ oil cartels to focus on “national interests”, it announced yesterday, causing fresh shockwaves as energy prices soar over the Middle East war. The UAE, one of the world’s top oil producers, which has previously chafed at Opec production quotas, will pull out on Friday, a statement carried by the official WAM news agency said. The UAE has been an Opec member through the emirate of Abu Dhabi since 1967, four years before the former British protectorate became a country. The last Opec member to withdraw from the cartel was Angola in 2024. “This decision reflects the UAE’s long-term strategic and economic vision and evolving energy profile,” the UAE statement said. “During our time in the organisation, we made significant contributions and even greater sacrifices for the benefit of all,” it added.“However, the time has come to focus our efforts on what our national interest dictates.” The decision, in the midst of the biggest oil shock since the 1970s, is likely to weaken Opec, dominated by the UAE’s neighbour Saudi Arabia, indicating further turbulence for markets, analysts said.Gulf oil shipments are currently being strangled by Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which flows past the UAE and normally carries one-fifth of the world’s oil. Given the restrictions on oil shipments in the strait, the UAE did not want to be constrained by quotas once the situation was back to normal, a source close to the energy ministry told AFP. The UAE, hard-hit by Iranian attacks, has also faced trouble in its relationship with Saudi Arabia, the world’s top oil exporter, after a stand-off between rival forces backed by the two countries in Yemen. Pre-war, the UAE was the fourth biggest producer in the 22-member Opec+, behind Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iraq.Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad Energy, said its withdrawal may not immediately impact oil markets while Hormuz shipments remain on hold. Jamie Ingram, managing editor for the Middle East Economic Survey, posted that Opec is losing 13% of its production capacity with the UAE’s departure, citing the International Energy Agency.Founded in 1960, the 12-member Opec cartel in 2016 partnered up with 10 other producers to form Opec+ to gain more clout. Source link
His Highness the Amir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani Tuesday joined Their Majesties and Highnesses the GCC leaders and heads of delegations at a consultative summit held in Jeddah, where discussions focused on regional and international developments.HH the Amir was accompanied by senior officials, including His Excellency Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim al-Thani, His Excellency Chief of the Amiri Diwan Abdullah bin Mohammed al-Khulaifi, His Excellency Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Sultan bin Saad al-Muraikhi, along with other members of the official delegation. Following the meeting, HH the Amir attended a luncheon hosted by Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, in honour of the participating Gulf leaders.Earlier, HH the Amir was received upon arrival at the Royal Terminal at King Abdulaziz International Airport by Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud. Secretary-General of GCC, Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi was also present at the reception, alongside Deputy Governor of Makkah Region, Prince Saud bin Mishaal bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, Qatar’s ambassador Bandar bin Mohammed al-Attiyah, and Saudi ambassador to Qatar Prince Saad bin Mansour bin Saad bin Saud bin Abdulaziz al-Saud as well as senior Saudi officials.Later, HH the Amir departed Saudi Arabia following his participation in the consultative summit. Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, expressed his gratitude to the GCC leaders for their efforts at the Consultative Gulf Summit hosted by the Kingdom. This summit reflects the kingdom’s commitment to strengthening communication and consultation, and supporting coordination and joint action to achieve regional security and stability, he said. Related Story Source link
A child looks through damaged wall at an open-air art exhibition at the Bureij camp for Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip Tuesday. (AFP) Israeli authorities are systematically depriving people in Gaza of the water they need to live, Doctors Without Borders warned Tuesday, decrying a campaign of “collective punishment” against Palestinians. The extensive destruction of civilian water infrastructure in Gaza coupled with obstruction of access constitutes “an integral part of Israel’s genocide”, said the medical charity, which goes by its French acronym MSF. In a report entitled “Water as a Weapon”, MSF said the “engineered scarcity” was occurring alongside “direct killing of civilians, the devastation of health facilities, (and) the destruction of homes”. Together, this amounted to “the deliberate infliction of destructive and inhumane conditions of life on the Palestinian population in Gaza”, warned the report, based on testimonies and data MSF collected in 2024 and 2025. “Israeli authorities know that without water, life ends,” MSF emergency manager Claire San Filippo said in a statement. “Yet they have deliberately and systematically obliterated water infrastructure in Gaza, whilst consistently blocking water-related supplies from entering.” Despite an October ceasefire that largely halted the Gaza war that began after Hamas’s 2023 attack on Israel, the territory remains gripped by daily violence as Israeli strikes continue and both the Israeli military and Hamas accuse each other of breaking the truce. ‘Engineered’ scarcityThe MSF report, which was slammed by Israel, pointed to data from the United Nations, European Union and World Bank indicating that Israel had destroyed or damaged nearly 90% of water and sanitation infrastructure in Gaza. “Desalination plants, boreholes, pipelines and sewage systems have been rendered inoperable or inaccessible,” it said. The charity documented several incidents where its clearly identified water trucks and boreholes had been shot at or destroyed. “Palestinians have been injured and killed simply trying to access water,” San Filippo said. The charity said that besides the local authorities, it was the largest producer and main distributor of drinking water in Gaza. Last month, it provided more than 5.3 million litres of water each day, which meets the minimum needs of more than 407,000 people, or a fifth of Gaza’s population. However, throughout the war, “Israeli military displacement orders have locked our teams out of areas where we had provided water to hundreds of thousands of people,” the MSF statement said. ‘Perfect storm’MSF said a third of its requests to bring in critical water and sanitation supplies, including water desalination units, pumps, water tanks, insect repellent, chlorine and other chemicals to treat water, had “been rejected or left unanswered”. San Filippo also cautioned that the deprivation of water, “combined with dire living conditions, extreme overcrowding, and a collapsed health system, create a perfect storm for the spread of diseases”. MSF called on Israel to “immediately restore water for people at the required levels in Gaza”. It urged Israel’s allies to “use their leverage to pressure Israel to stop impeding humanitarian access”. COGAT, the Israeli defence ministry body in charge of Palestinian civilian affairs, harshly criticised “the baseless claims” presented in the report. It maintained in a statement that “water supply in Gaza consistently exceeds humanitarian thresholds”, insisting that “far from ‘preventing’ access, Israel facilitates and provides water from its own sources”.MSF’s “operational delays” were a result of the organisation’s “refusal to follow standard registration protocols and their history of employing individuals linked to terror”, COGAT charged. Contacted by AFP, MSF did not wish to react to Israel’s accusations. Related…
Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland: French champion Dorian Godon took a surprise victory in the Tour de Romandie opening prologue Tuesday as world champion Tadej Pogacar could finish only fifth. Godon’s three previous individual victories this year had all come in sprint finishes but he covered the 3.2km course around Villars-sur-Glane in 3min 35sec to finish six seconds clear of Portugal’s Ivo Oliveira and Swede Jakob Soderqvist in second and third respectively. Pogacar, who two days ago won the 260km-long Liege-Bastogne-Liege one-day race for the fourth time, was a further second back in fifth, just behind Swiss champion Mauro Schmid.It is four-time Tour de France winner Pogacar’s first stage race of the year having previously taken part in just five one-day races – winning four of them. He is the overwhelming favourite to win the Romandie tour in Switzerland this week in what is his first participation at the event. It is one of the few major week-long stage races that he is yet to win in his career, along with June’s Tour de Suisse, which he will take part in for the first time before bidding for a record-equalling fifth Tour de France in July. Pogacar gained time on his main rivals for the overall victory in Romandie as Slovenian compatriot Primoz Roglic, a two-time former winner, was eighth, eight seconds off Godon. Roglic’s Red Bull-Bora Hansgrohe team-mate Florian Lipowitz was 10th, another two seconds further back, with Frenchman Lenny Martinez 25th at 17sec. Today’s first full stage is a 171km ride around Martigny, where the tough 8.9km-long Ovronnaz climb with an average gradient of 9.8 percent in the final 40km will provide Pogacar a first chance to distance his rivals. Source link