Browsing: National
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, offers a speech at Tsinghua University, in Beijing, Monday. (Reuters) Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez Monday said China should take on a more substantial role with issues including climate change, security, defence and the fight against inequality, adding that Europe will also have to redouble its efforts as the US withdraws from leadership roles on many fronts.Sanchez, who is making his fourth visit to China in four years, spoke at Beijing’s Tsinghua University.His visit comes as many Western governments seek to maintain engagement with Beijing despite lingering security and trade tensions. It follows visits to China earlier this year by the prime ministers of Britain, Ireland, Canada and Finland.Spain has been one of Europe’s loudest proponents of expanding trade and treating China as a strategic ally rather than an economic and geopolitical rival.Sanchez said China could do more in terms of fighting climate change, promoting global health, controlling the development of responsible artificial intelligence as well as nuclear weapons.”For example, by demanding as it is doing, that international law be respected and that the conflicts in Lebanon, Iran, Gaza and the West Bank and Ukraine cease,” he said.”Europe will also have to redouble its efforts, especially now that the US has decided to withdraw from many of these fronts.”Sanchez is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping today where they are expected to focus on geopolitics.China accounted for 74% of Spain’s total trade deficit, Sanchez said, adding that co-operation was important to build a “balanced, globalised economy that generates shared prosperity.”Madrid hopes Sanchez’s visit will narrow Spain’s trade deficit, which more than doubled in four years to nearly $50bn in 2025. It is looking to boost agricultural and manufacturing exports to offset high volumes of China’s imports.China’s official news agency Xinhua Monday said Sanchez’s visit was set to further consolidate bilateral ties and pointed to a broader pathway for steady engagement between China and Europe at a time of growing global uncertainty. Related Story Source link
Philippine Navy spokesman Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad speaks next to a slide presentation of seized yellow bottles suspected to contain cyanide in waters of Second…
US President Donald Trump has criticised Pope Leo XIV as “terrible” in an unusual, direct attack on the Pontiff, who responded by vowing to continue denouncing war and suffering.The president’s comments came after the Pope had spoken out, with growing force, against the US-Israeli war on Iran and the Trump administration’s hardline immigration policies.”Pope Leo is WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social late on Sunday.Pope Leo, the first Pontiff from the US, responded Monday by saying that he would continue to denounce war, adding that the Christian message, rooted in the primacy of peace, was being “abused”.”I will continue to speak out loudly against war, looking to promote peace, promoting dialogue and multilateral relationships among the states to look for just solutions to problems,” he told Reuters aboard a papal flight to Algiers, where he is embarking on a 10-day tour to four African countries.”Too many people are suffering in the world today,” Leo said. “Too many innocent people are being killed. And I think someone has to stand up and say there’s a better way.”Catholics on social media lambasted Trump for attacking the leader of the 1.4bn-member Catholic Church.”There is no ambiguity about the situation now,” Massimo Faggioli, an expert on the papacy, told Reuters.He compared the comments to efforts by the leaders of Germany and Italy during World War II to draw the late Pope Pius XII to support their causes.”Not even Hitler or Mussolini attacked the pope so directly and publicly,” said Faggioli.Archbishop Paul S Coakley, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, said that he was disheartened by Trump’s comments.Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned Trump’s criticism of Leo’s comments as “unacceptable”, saying that “it is right and normal for (Leo) to call for peace and to condemn all forms of war”.Leo, originally from Chicago, is known for choosing his words carefully.He has emerged as an outspoken critic of the conflict with Iran in recent weeks and decried the “madness of war” in a peace appeal on Saturday.Last year, he questioned whether the Trump administration’s hardline immigration policies were in line with the church’s pro-life teachings, and called for a “deep reflection” about the way migrants are being treated in the United States.Trump wrote in his post on Sunday that “Leo should get his act together as Pope”, later telling reporters he was “not a big fan” of the Pontiff.Trump’s broadside against Leo also accused him of being “weak on nuclear weapons”, several days after the Pope said the US president’s threat to destroy Iranian civilisation was “truly unacceptable”.In a speech on Palm Sunday last month in St. Peter’s Square in the Vatican, the Pope said God rejected the prayers of leaders who start wars and have their “hands full of blood”, calling the conflict in Iran “atrocious”.Leo has also called on Trump to find an “off-ramp” to end the conflict and “decrease the amount of violence”.In his post, Trump suggested that Leo was only elected to lead the Catholic Church last year “because he was an American, and they thought that would be the best way to deal with President Donald J Trump”.Leo said Monday that he was not a politician and did not want to be drawn into a debate with Trump.Trump also had a rocky relationship with Leo’s predecessor, Pope Francis, who criticised Trump’s immigration policy proposals when he first ran for president and suggested Trump was “not a Christian”.Trump had called Francis “disgraceful” in early 2016. Related Story Source link
After a sleepless and at times tense night in Islamabad, Iranian and US officials ended their highest-level talks in decades without a breakthrough, but 11 sources familiar with the negotiations said dialogue was still alive.The weekend meeting to resolve the conflict between the US and Iran, held four days after last Tuesday's ceasefire announcement, was the first direct encounter between US and Iranian officials in more than a decade and the most senior engagement since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution.Inside Islamabad's luxury Serena Hotel, the talks unfolded across two separate wings and one common area – one for the US side, one for the Iranians and one for trilateral meetings involving Pakistani mediators, operational staff told Reuters.Among the slew of issues at stake was the Strait of Hormuz, a major transit point for global energy supplies that Iran has effectively blocked but the US has vowed to reopen, as well as Iran's nuclear programme and international sanctions on Tehran.Phones were not allowed in the main room, forcing delegates, including US Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, to step out during breaks to relay messages back home, two of the sources said.’There was a strong hope in the middle of the talks that there would be a breakthrough and the two sides would reach an agreement. However, things changed within no time,’ a Pakistani government source said.Another source involved in the talks said the parties came ‘very close’ to an agreement and were ‘80% there’, before running into decisions that could not be settled on the spot.Two senior Iranian sources described the atmosphere as heavy and unfriendly, adding that while Pakistan tried to soften the mood, neither side showed any willingness to ease tensions.At one point, atmosphere began to liftNevertheless the two Iranian sources said that by early Sunday morning the atmosphere had shown some improvement, and the possibility of a one-day extension began to take shape.However, differences persisted. A US source said the Iranians did not properly understand that the core US aim was to have a deal that ensured Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon. Among Iran's concerns was a distrust of US intentions.This account, based on sources who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter, offers a first account of the internal dynamics of the meeting, how the mood in the room shifted, how talks ended after signs the meeting might be extended, and how further dialogue remains on the cards.There was no immediate response from the Iranian government to a request for comment on the issues reported in this story.Monday US President Donald Trump said Iran had ‘called this morning’ and that ‘they'd like to work a deal.’ Reuters could not immediately verify the assertion.A US official, referring to Trump's comment, said there was continued engagement between the US and Iran and forward motion on trying to get to an agreement.Asked for comment, White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said the US position had never shifted in the Islamabad meeting.’Iran can never have a nuclear weapon, and President Trump’s negotiating team stuck to this red line and many others. Engagement continues toward an agreement,” she said.'Ups and downs'A Middle East-based diplomat said conversations between mediators and the Americans have continued since Vance left Islamabad, while the source involved in the talks said Pakistan was still passing messages between Tehran and Washington.’I want to tell you that a full effort is still on to resolve the issues,’ Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Monday.Despite numerous obstacles to peace, both sides appear to have strong reasons to consider de-escalation.The US strikes appear unpopular at home and look unlikely to topple Iran's theocratic ruling system, while Tehran's strangling of energy supplies is hurting the global economy and pushing up inflation months before US midterm elections.Also, war damage to Iran's ailing economy risks leaving the authorities there weaker internally just weeks after protests they were able to put down only with mass killings.In Islamabad, the longtime foes had gathered to try to chart a path to a long-term settlement, after a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire paused six weeks of war that has killed thousands of people and disrupted the world's energy supplies.Central to the dispute is a belief among Western countries and Israel that Iran wants a nuclear bomb. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons.A White House official said the US wanted Iran to end all uranium enrichment, dismantle all major nuclear enrichment facilities, turn over its highly enriched uranium, accept a broader peace, agree a security framework that includes regional allies, end funding for regional proxies and fully open Hormuz, charging no tolls.Iran’s demands included a guaranteed permanent ceasefire, assurances of no future strikes on Iran and its allies in the region, lifting of primary and secondary sanctions, unfreezing of all assets, recognition of its right to enrichment and continued control of Hormuz, Iranian sources have said.Four of the 11 sources said that at times the dialogue appeared close to producing at least a framework understanding, but unraveled over Iran's nuclear programme, the Hormuz Strait and the amount of frozen assets Tehran wants access to.The Iranian sources said most of the substantive exchanges in Islamabad were between Vance, Qalibaf and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi.’There were ups and downs. There were tense moments. People left the room, and then came back,’ the security source said.Pakistani representatives, including Army Chief Asim Munir, and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, moved between the sides through the night to keep things on track, five Pakistani sources said.'How can we trust you?'The talks stretched for more than 20 hours with on-duty hotel staff eating, sleeping and working on site after undergoing expedited background checks, they said.When discussions turned to guarantees, both non-aggression assurances and sanctions relief, the tone of the normally mild-mannered Araqchi grew sharper, the two Iranian sources said.The sources quoted him as saying: ‘How can we trust you when, in the last Geneva meeting, you said the US would not attack while diplomacy was under way?”The US-Israeli attack on Iran began two days after the two sides held a previous round of talks in Geneva.In addition to differences over Hormuz, sanctions and other topics, the two sides also disagreed over the scope of any deal. While Washington focused on the nuclear file and Hormuz, Tehran wanted a broader understanding, according to two of the sources.During one tense moment, raised voices could be heard outside the negotiating room before Munir and Dar called a tea break and moved the two sides back into separate rooms, the government source said. 'Our final and best offer'Toward the final stages of the discussions, which spilled into Sunday morning, the US delegates were moving between the negotiating room and their private floor far more often than the Iranians, the senior Pakistani official said.A US source said the vice president came to the talks with the aim of making a deal and reaching a mutual understanding. The US side has been wary of protracted negotiations with Iran, believing the Iranians are adept at delaying tactics and refusing to make concessions, the source said.Despite the deadlock, when Vance appeared in front of reporters later to announce the talks had ended, his remarks suggested more exchanges of some kind might be in prospect.’We leave here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding that is our final and best offer,’ he said. ‘We'll see if the Iranians accept it.’ Source link
US President Donald Trump’s attack on Pope Leo was “unacceptable”, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said Monday, joining forces with politicians of all colours in springing to the Pontiff’s defence. The statement represented an extremely rare public rebuke of Trump from Meloni, who has cultivated particularly close ties with the US president, underscoring widespread anger in Italy over his broadside on Pope Leo. Trump set off the furore by calling Leo “terrible” in a long tirade on Sunday. He subsequently posted an artificial intelligence (AI) image depicting himself as a Messiah-like figure, sparking further outrage among Christians who saw the image. Meloni issued an initial statement backing Leo as he flew off on an ambitious four-nation visit to Africa, but made no specific mention of Trump’s broadside. Opposition politicians accused her of lacking the courage to directly challenge Trump, prompting her to issue a second statement later in the day to clarify her position. “I thought the meaning of my statement this morning was clear, but I will restate it more explicitly. I find President Trump’s words about the Holy Father unacceptable,” Meloni said. “The Pope is the head of the Catholic Church, and it is right and normal for him to call for peace and to condemn every form of war.” Meloni was the only European leader to attend Trump’s inauguration in 2025 and she had hoped their friendship would boost her standing at home and abroad. However, Trump risks becoming a liability, with 66% of Italians having a negative view of the US leader. Pollsters say that Meloni’s ties to the White House might have been a factor in her defeat last month in a referendum on judicial reform. Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, who has also in the past associated himself closely with Trump, also distanced himself from the US leader Monday, highlighting how Europe’s far-right is trying to draw back from the MAGA (Make America Great Again) orbit. “Pope Leo is a spiritual leader for billions of Catholics, but beyond that, if there is one person striving for peace, it is Pope Leo, and so attacking him does not seem either wise or helpful,” he said in a statement. The Pope is the bishop of Rome and spiritual leader to millions of Italian Catholics, making politicians of all stripes wary about taking him on. “It has been centuries since such a blatant act of aggression against the Roman pontiff was seen,” said former centre-left prime minister Matteo Renzi, adding that it was vital for Catholics and non-believers alike to defend Leo. “He is, after all, a ‘builder of bridges,’ unlike Trump, a destroyer of relationships and of civilisation. The only advantage is this: Trumps come and go, popes remain,” he said. The comment echoed an Italian saying, “chi mangia papa crepa” which roughly means, “whoever tries to devour the pope dies” – a proverb born of centuries of tension between successive papacies and temporal rulers. “Trump has made the mistake of the century, because ‘chi mangia papa crepa’ has been borne out repeatedly,” said church historian Alberto Melloni, pointing to Italy’s royal family, the House of Savoy, which clashed repeatedly with the Vatican during the 19th century only to be swept away while the papacy lived on. Antonio Spadaro, a Roman Catholic priest and undersecretary of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Culture and Education, said Trump’s attack revealed his own weakness. “If Leo were irrelevant, he would not merit any comment. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed – a sign that his words matter,” Spadaro wrote on X. “This is where the church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control.” Source link
Firefighters work at the site of a building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Zaporizhzhia, Monday. (Reuters) Two people were killed and one injured by Russian troops in Ukraine’s frontline eastern Donetsk region before the expiry of a ceasefire to mark Orthodox Easter, a local official said Monday. One person was killed in the city of Kramatorsk and one in Druzhkivka on Sunday, regional governor Vadym Filashkin said on the Telegram messaging app, without giving more details. Both Russia and Ukraine have accused each other of breaching the 32-hour ceasefire from Saturday afternoon to midnight on Sunday. Ukraine’s Co-ordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, citing a spokesperson of the 14th Army Corps, said Monday that during “the so-called ‘Easter ceasefire’” Russian servicemen also shot dead four Ukrainian prisoners of war in the Kharkiv region. It did not give more details, adding that Russia was preparing a campaign to deny it. There was no immediate comment from Russia and Reuters could not verify the information independently. The General Staff of Ukraine’s military said Monday it had compiled a total of 10,721 Russian violations over the course of the truce. It said the violations included 1,567 artillery shelling incidents, 119 assault operations and 9,035 strikes by attack drones. It said no air strikes had been recorded. The Russian defence ministry has said it recorded 1,971 ceasefire violations by Ukraine overnight into Sunday. Related Story…
President Donald Trump ordered the US Navy on Sunday to block the crucial Strait of Hormuz shipping lane, furious with Iran's refusal to surrender its nuclear ambitions after peace talks in Pakistan broke down without an agreement.In response to Trump's announcement, Iran's Revolutionary Guards warned they had traffic in the strategic waterway under their full control and would trap any enemy who tried to challenge it ‘in a deadly vortex’.In a lengthy declaration on his social media platform, Trump said his eventual goal was to clear the strait of mines and reopen it to all shipping, but that in the meantime Iran must not be allowed to profit from its control of the waterway.’Effective immediately, the United States Navy, the Finest in the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz,’ Trump said. ‘Any Iranian who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!’Iran has itself been restricting traffic through the strait — a key route for global shipments of oil, gas and fertiliser — while allowing vessels deemed to be working for friendly countries, such as China, to pass. There have been unconfirmed reports that Tehran plans to charge tolls.’THIS IS WORLD EXTORTION,’ Trump said. ‘I have also instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas. We will also begin destroying the mines the Iranians laid in the Straits.’The US military had said Saturday that two Navy warships transited through the strait to begin clearing it of mines and ensure it was a ‘safe pathway’ for tankers, a claim denied by Tehran.Iran's Fars news agency reported on Sunday that two Pakistani-flagged oil tankers heading for the strait had turned around.Fears of renewed fighting rattled an already tense region after the US-Iran talks collapsed.’I am worried about the continuation of the situation and the return of attacks again,’ said Imam, an Egyptian housewife living in UAE capital Abu Dhabi.’I was making a great effort not to pass my tension on to the children.’'Act of extortion' Trump later in a Fox News interview again threatened Iran's energy infrastructure, before warning he would impose a 50 percent tariff on Chinese imports if Beijing tried to help the Iranian military.’I could take out Iran in one day. I could have their entire energy everything, every one of their plants, their electric generating plants, which is a big deal,’ he said.The president's latest ultimatum appeared to have been triggered by the failure of talks to secure a deal to end the six-week-old war, which began when the US and Israel launched strikes on Tehran and killed Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei.Iran's refusal to give up its right to a nuclear programme frustrated the US delegation, led by Vice President JD Vance, White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner.’I have always said, right from the beginning, and many years ago, IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!’ Trump said.’The Blockade will begin shortly. Other Countries will be involved with this Blockade,’ he added, without specifying.Experts said blocking the crucial waterway in the middle of a two-week ceasefire, after the Islamabad negotiations, would further erode America's global credibility.’Imposing a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz right now — even if it's implementable, which remains an open question — is bewildering and seems self-defeating,’ said Shibley Telhami, a professor of peace and development at the University of Maryland.Vance left Pakistan after the talks — the highest-level meeting between the two sides since the 1979 Islamic revolution — and warned that Washington had made Tehran its ‘final and best offer’ for a deal, adding: ‘We'll see if the Iranians accept it.’Iran's parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the head of his country's negotiating team, said he had ‘put forward constructive initiatives’ but the US team did not win Iran's trust.Ceasefire efforts The failure of the talks will raise concerns that a return to fighting could drive world energy prices higher and further damage shipping and oil and gas facilities.Pakistan, which hosted the talks, urged both countries to continue respecting the temporary truce.UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the Sultan of Oman, Haitham bin Tariq, and both leaders agreed it ‘was vital there was a continuation of the ceasefire, and that all parties avoided any further escalation’.An EU spokesman said diplomacy would be ‘essential’ to securing peace and hailed Pakistan's mediation efforts, while Russia's President Vladimir Putin called Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to offer his services to the diplomatic effort.’Vladimir Putin emphasised his readiness to further facilitate the search for a political and diplomatic settlement to the conflict, and to mediate efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in the Middle East,’ the Kremlin said, in its readout of the call. Source link
South Korean Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol said Monday that South Korea aims to expand its free trade agreement (FTA) network with emerging markets, such as Latin America and Africa, in its latest effort to diversify supply chains.”Rather than simply responding to trade issues, the government will expand its FTA network to support export growth,” Yonhap News Agency quoted the finance minister as saying.He noted that the global trade environment is undergoing a structural change due to the weakening of multilateral trade norms and increasing competition among major countries.In response, the government sees a need to continuously expand and strategically upgrade its FTA network.”In the future, we will broaden our FTA map to emerging markets, such as Southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa, to diversify global supply chains,” he said.South Korea has signed 21 free trade deals covering 59 countries, the finance ministry said. Source link
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday called for the resumption of peace negotiations between the United States and Iran, and for an end to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.The call by Albanese came during a television interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), where he expressed hope for achieving lasting peace, comprehensive de-escalation, and ending the tragedy of civilian casualties and the destruction of civilian infrastructure – most importantly, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to ensure freedom of navigation.The Australian Prime Minister reaffirmed that his country has not received any request to participate in the US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, emphasizing the need to restore freedom of navigation in this vital trade route. Source link
Turkiye’s foreign minister Hakan Fidan has expressed concern over emerging proposals by Iran and the United States to introduce new rules governing passage through the Strait of Hormuz, warning of significant challenges surrounding efforts to secure the vital shipping route.Speaking to Anadolu Agency on Monday, Fidan said reopening the strait should be achieved through diplomacy, following the failure of weekend talks between Washington and Tehran to reach an agreement on ending the ongoing conflict.He suggested that progress could still be made within weeks if negotiations move in a constructive direction, noting that Tehran is expected to review and respond to a US proposal. However, he cautioned that disagreements over uranium enrichment remain a key obstacle.If the issue of uranium enrichment becomes an all-or-nothing matter, we may face serious difficulties, Fidan said, adding that both sides appear committed to securing a ceasefire and recognize its urgency.The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most critical oil shipping routes, and any disruption has far-reaching implications for global energy markets.Fidan also warned that broader regional tensions risk escalating further. He described the situation in Lebanon as part of what he called expansionist policies by Israel, cautioning that the crisis could draw the region into a wider conflict.He emphasized the need for a regional security framework, calling for the establishment of a new alliance aimed at building trust among neighboring states and preventing further instability. Source link