Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
Browsing: National
The member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) called for a final agreement between the US and Iran, welcoming the two-week ceasefire announced on April 8, 2026, affirming the need to build on it to reduce escalation in the region.ASEAN stressed in a statement the importance of maintaining maritime safety and security and preserving freedom of navigation and overflight over international straits, in accordance with international law, particularly the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the standards adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO), calling for the restoration of safe and unimpeded passage for ships and aircraft in the Strait of Hormuz, and ensuring the safety of seafarers and ships in accordance with relevant international agreements.The member states also urged Washington and Tehran to continue negotiations leading to a permanent end to the conflict and stability in the region, praising the efforts of Pakistan and the parties concerned in facilitating dialogue between the two sides.ASEAN affirmed the need for the full and effective implementation of the ceasefire, which would contribute to reducing human losses, ensure the safety of navigation and freedom of passage for civilian ships and aircraft, reduce disruptions in energy and commodity supplies, and mitigate their impact on the global economy.It also called on all parties to strictly adhere to the terms of the ceasefire, exercise maximum restraint, cease hostilities, avoid any steps that would escalate tensions, and work collectively to reach a comprehensive and sustainable solution in accordance with international law, the UN Charter and UN Security Council resolutions.ASEAN reaffirmed the importance of maintaining regional peace, stability and prosperity, and promoting dialogue and diplomacy as a key means of addressing conflicts.It also reaffirmed the commitment of states to resolve their disputes by peaceful means, respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states, protect civilians and civilian infrastructure, and ensure the safety of peacekeeping forces and humanitarian workers, in accordance with international law and the UN Charter. Related Story Source link
Japan hopes a “final agreement” will be concluded swiftly between the US and Iran to de-escalate the Middle East situation, after Washington-Tehran weekend peace talks failed to reach a deal.”What is most important is that de-escalation, including securing the safety of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, is actually achieved,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said in a press conference Monday, adding that Tokyo is closely watching developments and will continue to work with the international community.Kihara also said no decision has been made about whether Japan plans to send its Self-Defense Forces for minesweeping operations in the strait, a chokepoint for global energy transportation.Japan relies on the Middle East for more than 90% of its crude oil imports. Most transit the strait, which Iran has effectively closed since the US and Israel began attacking the country in late February. Source link
Singapore has flatly rejected any suggestion it would pay transit fees to Iran for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, with Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan telling parliament the right of free navigation is enshrined in international law — not a toll concession for Tehran to extract. Responding to a parliamentary question, Balakrishnan said Singapore would continue engaging Iran diplomatically but ruled out any negotiation over safe passage fees. “It is not a privilege to be granted by the bordering state, it’s not a licence to be supplicated for, it is not a toll to be paid,” he said. The remarks come as Iran has imposed what shipping sources describe as a de facto toll system — administered by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps — in the wake of US and Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure. Reports suggest demands of up to $2mn per vessel, payable in cryptocurrency or yuan, ostensibly to fund reconstruction. Traffic through the strait plummeted by an estimated 90% during peak hostilities, with only partial recovery following a tentative ceasefire. Tehran, which signed but never ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), maintains it is not bound by its transit passage provisions and retains the right to regulate movement through its territorial waters on security grounds. Balakrishnan dismissed that argument, saying non-ratification was not a “get-out-of-jail-free card” and that the principle of free transit applied universally as customary international law. Singapore’s hard line is rooted as much in strategic interest as legal principle. Balakrishnan drew an explicit parallel with the Strait of Malacca and the Strait of Singapore — chokepoints that carry roughly a quarter to two-fifths of global seaborne trade, including nearly half of China’s oil imports. Were Hormuz tolls to go unchallenged, he warned, similar demands could follow on the very waterways Singapore depends on for its economic existence. The shipping industry has broadly backed Singapore’s stance, with insurers and major operators advised against payment to avoid legitimising the practice. A clip of Balakrishnan’s remarks, posted to social media on April 11, drew more than 3mn views and sharp debate over the tension between legal norms and geopolitical realities. Related Story Source link
Singapore Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan. (Reuters file photo) Singapore has flatly rejected any suggestion it would pay transit fees to Iran for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, with Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan telling parliament the right of free navigation is enshrined in international law — not a toll concession for Tehran to extract.Responding to a parliamentary question, Balakrishnan said Singapore would continue engaging Iran diplomatically but ruled out any negotiation over safe passage fees. “It is not a privilege to be granted by the bordering state, it’s not a licence to be supplicated for, it is not a toll to be paid,” he said.The remarks come as Iran has imposed what shipping sources describe as a de facto toll system — administered by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps — in the wake of US and Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure. Reports suggest demands of up to $2mn per vessel, payable in cryptocurrency or yuan, ostensibly to fund reconstruction. Traffic through the strait plummeted by an estimated 90% during peak hostilities, with only partial recovery following a tentative ceasefire.Tehran, which signed but never ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), maintains it is not bound by its transit passage provisions and retains the right to regulate movement through its territorial waters on security grounds. Balakrishnan dismissed that argument, saying non-ratification was not a “get-out-of-jail-free card” and that the principle of free transit applied universally as customary international law.Singapore’s hard line is rooted as much in strategic interest as legal principle. Balakrishnan drew an explicit parallel with the Strait of Malacca and the Strait of Singapore — chokepoints that carry roughly a quarter to two-fifths of global seaborne trade, including nearly half of China’s oil imports. Were Hormuz tolls to go unchallenged, he warned, similar demands could follow on the very waterways Singapore depends on for its economic existence.The shipping industry has broadly backed Singapore’s stance, with insurers and major operators advised against payment to avoid legitimising the practice. A clip of Balakrishnan’s remarks, posted to social media on April 11, drew more than 3mn views and sharp debate over the tension between legal norms and geopolitical realities. Source link
(FILES) Bollywood playback singer Asha Bhosle attends an event celebrating ‘Marathi Bhasha Gaurav Diwas,’ also known as Marathi Language Day, in Mumbai on February 27, 2025.…
The Arab Parliament announced Sunday that it launched a broad international campaign across parliamentary, human rights, and international levels to confront the so-called execution law for Palestinian prisoners approved by Israel’s Knesset.In a statement, the Arab Parliament stressed that the discriminatory legislation represents one of the most dangerous forms of legitimising systematic political killing against the Palestinian people, describing it as a fully-fledged legislative crime that undermines international law and threatens the global justice system.Arab Parliament Speaker Mohammed bin Ahmed al-Yamahi sent a series of urgent official letters to UN Secretary-General, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, President of the International Committee of the Red Cross, as well as heads of regional and international parliaments, calling for immediate and decisive action to halt the implementation of the law and hold those responsible accountable before international justice.Al-Yamahi stressed in his letters that the adoption of this law constitutes an unprecedented escalation in Israeli occupation policies, effectively institutionalising a new phase of systematic executions of Palestinian prisoners under a false legislative cover.He described it as a blatant violation of Geneva Conventions, international humanitarian law, and all relevant international human rights instruments, warning that any international silence or inaction regarding this law would be considered direct complicity in a fully-fledged crime, would grant the occupying entity political cover to continue its crimes, and would open the door to a serious collapse in the international legitimacy system and entrench a policy of impunity.He called on the international community to assume its legal and moral responsibilities and take urgent measures, including activating international accountability mechanisms, referring the crime to competent judicial bodies, ensuring immediate international protection for Palestinian prisoners, and forming independent fact-finding committees to investigate serious violations committed against them in Israeli occupation prisons.He also renewed calls to suspend and freeze the membership of Israeli Knesset in the Inter-Parliamentary Union and other international parliamentary forums, affirming that the Arab Parliament It will continue its political, diplomatic, and parliamentary efforts until the discriminatory law is repealed and the occupying authorities are held accountable for their escalating crimes against Palestinian prisoners. Related Story Source link
From left: Nasa astronauts Reid Wiseman, commander, Christina Koch, mission specialist, Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen, mission specialist, and Nasa astronaut Victor Glover, Artemis II…
Vehicles block Dublin’s O’Connell Street, as part of a protest over the high cost of fuel that clogged up busy thoroughfares and motorways across Ireland for…
Raymond Greene. (Reuters/File Photo) The top US diplomat in Taiwan said China should abandon its threats and military pressure against Taiwan and talk to the island’s leaders as that would avoid misunderstandings and stabilise relations.Raymond Greene, the de facto ambassador as head of the American Institute in Taiwan, which handles relations in the absence of formal diplomatic ties, said the consistent US policy has been to support exchanges across the Taiwan Strait.He was discussing the visit of Taiwan’s opposition leader to China on a Taiwanese political talk show on Saturday.”However, we also expect China — Beijing — to maintain open communication channels with all of Taiwan’s political parties, especially the leaders elected by the Taiwanese people, in order to avoid misunderstandings and to stabilise cross-strait relations,” Greene said in Mandarin.”We further expect China to abandon threats against Taiwan or military pressure. I believe this would help ease cross-strait tensions.”China’s Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.China views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory and has never renounced the use of force to bring the island under its control. Taiwan’s government rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims.Beijing refuses to speak to Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, saying he is a “separatist”, but Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday met Cheng Li-wun, chairwoman of Taiwan’s largest opposition party, the Kuomintang, during what she called a mission of peace to China.The Chinese military operates daily around Taiwan, activities that have continued while Cheng has been in China.Taiwan’s opposition, which has a majority in parliament, has stalled government military spending plans, including an extra $40bn special defence budget which has provisions to buy US weapons and which Washington has backed.Despite the lack of formal diplomatic ties, the US is Taiwan’s most important arms supplier and international backer.Greene said that while the US supports dialogue, that cannot replace deterrence.”I don’t think there is a conflict here, because if there is sufficient deterrence capability, it will lead to a more equal dialogue,” he added.”There are three ways to resolve cross-strait differences: the first is dialogue, the second is coercion and the third is war. So if Taiwan can have sufficient deterrence capability, it can take the option of war off the table.” Related Story Source link
People buy food at a curbside canteen in Manila last week.(AFP) Filipinos like their “pares”, a traditional beef stew, served hot — but the soaring cost of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) has made that prospect increasingly difficult since war erupted in the Middle East.To save a few pesos 20-year-old Eric Garcia delicately turned a knob to adjust the flame under his warming trays to the lowest setting as he grapples with fuel costs that have nearly doubled in price.While sticker shock at petrol stations has garnered the biggest headlines since the war forced the partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the rising price of LPG has hit the import-dependent archipelago’s humble street food vendors.A day before speaking to AFP, Garcia said he had been forced to raise the price of a bowl of pares to 65 pesos ($1.08) after fuel costs reduced his daily earnings by a quarter.”I’m only earning 1,500 pesos (per day), because the rest is spent on LPG,” he said.Garcia, who begins cooking at 3am every morning before hauling his stew to a middle-class neighbourhood on a converted motorbike, said an 11 kilo tank of fuel, which typically lasts four days, that once cost 870 pesos (about $14.50) now costs 1,600 pesos.”It’s the highest price of LPG that I’ve ever seen since I started here,” said Carlo Manalad, a supervisor at a store selling tanks of the gas, 90% of which is imported.”If (our suppliers’) prices are high, we also raise our prices. Our profit is still the same,” the 64-year-old told AFP.Many of the capital’s streetside food sellers, however, have no such luxury.”If we raise our prices, our customers will buy from other stalls,” said Ronilo Titom, who has run a curbside canteen that caters call centre workers and jeepney drivers, for two years.Even while holding the line on prices, Titom said he had noticed his customer base slowly shrinking since the war erupted.”Many of them have started to bring packed lunches instead (to save money),” said the 48-year-old who, like Garcia, is using his LPG ever more judiciously.”Sometimes we let the soup get cold,” he admitted, noting that the cost of ingredients for his dishes had also been on the uptick since the war broke out.The Philippines revealed on Tuesday war-driven inflation figures that showed food prices had increased nearly twice as fast in March as the month before.French fry vendor John Mark Abella, 25, who has also upped his prices by five pesos to compensate for LPG costs, told AFP he believed inflation was putting the squeeze on his mostly student customers.”I think we’ve got fewer customers… because they’re limiting their expenses because of the high prices of fuel and food,” he said.Sam Natividad, a 25-year-old call centre worker, said that was no illusion.”I’m limiting my expenses because… I also have to pay bills at home. I don’t have a big budget for my meals here,” she told AFP at a roadside canteen, adding it was “understandable” if street vendors had to raise their prices.Near Garcia’s pares stall, Allan Palong, a driver for a motorbike ride-hailing app, said he understood the vendor’s need to charge five pesos more for a bowl of stew, even if his own earnings were being crippled by fuel price hikes.”It’s very difficult for us now, all prices have gone up… the five-pesos mean a lot,” he said, while calling on the government to slash the excise tax on imported fuel.”What they’re doing is not enough… we can’t feel it.” Related Story Source link
